Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FixitGuy
You missed the " shall not be infringed " part ! I'm sure that the British Army would have liked for the colonists to have possessed inferior quality arms ; a view apparently not far removed from yours.

It seems the fed courts are determined to wield powers it does not constitutionally possess. The fed courts use the "commerce clause" argument out of the same whole cloth as the "establishment clause"; one to incrementally whittle the Second, the other to purge religion from the public square.The centralization of power is almost complete.

42 posted on 09/04/2003 8:00:33 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: lawdog
"You missed the " shall not be infringed " part ! I'm sure that the British Army would have liked for the colonists to have possessed inferior quality arms ; a view apparently not far removed from yours."

Go back and read #16 again until ya get it right.

I'm on YOUR side. My point is that I DO understand the 2nd amendment and the "Supremes" do not!

73 posted on 09/05/2003 9:21:52 PM PDT by FixitGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson