No Hablo Arabic: Clinton's Failure on CIA Translators

Washington Times via Frontpagemag.com ^ | 9/04/03 | Richard Miniter

[af_vet_1981]

Okay, do you mean unqualified lackeys who would not make waves, exposing the Clinton’s turbulence in ‘their presidency’?

I was thinking more along the lines that they did not ignore opportunities to recruit and/or appoint people who represent the Clintonian vision of America's future to key positions with civil service type protection so they can resist the Bush Administration and push a liberal agenda when possible.

[tdadams]

Oh, that's about the most unconvincing retort I think I've heard here in a long time. Where did you get that? Is it a carry over from kindergarten?

[af_vet_1981]

Oh, that's about the most unconvincing retort I think I've heard here in a long time. Where did you get that? Is it a carry over from kindergarten?

hal ta'aruf allughah allarabiyah ?

[yoe]

It will be the downfall of an honest man, Bush, that he didn't fire the lot of Clinton appointees when he took office. They have successfully thwarted many of his programs. I agree with all you say except; they aren't liberals, they are socialists. Being a plain spoken, true to his word sort of man, I don't think President Bush ever imagined how many knives would be pounded into his back, even as he extended his hand in non-partisanship - Ted Kennedy and Mrs. Clinton are among the top knife wielders.