What about his contempt for the law and the Constitution, his attack on it?
Could you help me out? I am not as familiar with case as you apparently are. How many people did Mr. Hill send to their early demise? You seem to indicate the 5 people met premature disposal at the hands of Mr. Hill. I don't mean to make light of people who were really injured, but please do not exaggerate to make a point. I don't want people to get killed over this issue, but I do want an honest debate. I don't like it when I believe some people are trying pull the wool over people's eyes to advance their sick political agendas. This is an issue where people wax eloquent about invented rights, justice, liberty...yada, yada, yada. I happen to believe quite sincerely in the Constitution, as it is really written and meant to be interpreted. People who support these kinds of procedures talk a good game, but they always try prevent people from seeing the reality of these procedures first hand so they can make up their own mind sans the editorial filter. What are you trying to hide? A picture and a video tape of these procedures I believe are worth 10 thousand words. There should be a law requiring anyone seeking such "medical" treatment to have to watch the procedure performed before undergoing such for themselves.
"yadda, yadda, yadda..."
You can call it that if you want, but like it or not, it is established law. Dismissing it because you don't like it doesn't change that.
Your attempts to change the subject to the offensiveness of the procedure itself are becoming disengenuous. No one is attempting to hide anything; however, you are seeking to divert the conversation. Again, no sale.