1 posted on
09/03/2003 9:20:39 PM PDT by
dogbyte12
To: dogbyte12
Next on Maury:
Who My Baby Daddy?
The Chronicle usually has no problem with this sort of thing. Fathers are usually a secondary thought...
To: dogbyte12
Let see: Sharon spreads lies about Neil so she can get a nice nasty book deal to harm the Bush family, the publishers will eat it up for sure.
Meanwhile the *real* father is pissed because his own son is being hurt and his rights as a father may be hurt.
Sweet, real sweet.
3 posted on
09/03/2003 9:30:02 PM PDT by
WOSG
(Lower Taxes means economic growth)
To: dogbyte12
Hmmmmmmmm. a little blood work should solve that argument....
4 posted on
09/03/2003 9:34:27 PM PDT by
deport
To: dogbyte12
Oooh, where do I start?
"This has been a nightmare," said Robert Andrews, the ex-husband of the woman now dating presidential son and brother Neil Bush. "The allegations have been so nasty and so false I feel I must answer. My patience is used up." Gets better:
When asked at the press conference, Andrews said he had no plans to participate in a paternity test.
Dude, you're an idiot!
5 posted on
09/03/2003 9:34:36 PM PDT by
TheSpottedOwl
(This cow is independently owned and operated)
To: dogbyte12
worried not only about gossip but about Sharon Bush writing a book about the extended Bush family and including defamatory statements about Thomas Alexander.
Defamatory statements about a 2 year old? Come on.
Is it mandatory that the President have a brother that's a couple fries short of a Happy Meal?
8 posted on
09/03/2003 10:28:56 PM PDT by
lelio
To: dogbyte12
Seems as if Sharon Bush wants to keep this fiasco with the divorce going.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson