Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brian S
On Sept 16, 2001, the EPA draft said that "recent samples of dust ... on Water Street show higher levels of asbestos." The White House version read: "new samples confirm ... ambient air quality meets OSHA government standards,"

Well, duh! Of course there was higher levels of asbestos in the air -- two huge 110-story buildings built with asbestos insulation just crashed to the ground. The EPA version was unfinished and alarmist. The very next question after reading that "recent samples of dust ... show higher levels of asbestos" would be: "How much more do they show?" and "Is it safe?" The White House version answered those questions: the levels, although they were indeed higher, were nonetheless still under OSHA standards for safe exposure. The White House version made that point a lot clearer. They were not "hiding" tests indicating unsafe levels of asbestos dust in the air like the reporter tries to insinuate.

29 posted on 09/03/2003 9:52:32 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls
"the levels, although they were indeed higher, were nonetheless still under OSHA standards for safe exposure"

And acceptable OSHA levels are lower than low.
31 posted on 09/03/2003 9:55:56 PM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls
Well, duh! Of course there was higher levels of asbestos in the air -- two huge 110-story buildings built with asbestos insulation just crashed to the ground.

If so, it had to be from smaller nearby buildings.
The original plans for both towers had asbestos in the building plans. The environmentalists had a fit, and the building engineeers had to remove it and replace it with something "safer." That's why the towers burned the way they did. The original plans had them being 2 of the safest buildings ever built.

33 posted on 09/03/2003 10:01:06 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls
The Mercury levels were the biggest health hazard. The danger from the Asbestos particles were easily contained with simple dust (particle) masks. Mercury can be absorbed through the skin and when one considers all the thousands of thermostats in the WTC that contained Mercury and were destroyed when the Towers collapsed, it easy to see how Mercury exposure was a real problem
36 posted on 09/03/2003 10:27:20 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The Enemies of America can Count on the Democrats for Aid and Comfort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls
Well, duh! Of course there was higher levels of asbestos in the air -- two huge 110-story buildings built with asbestos insulation just crashed to the ground.

Yep, that'll do it every time.

My gosh, a week after 9/11 I think we all had bigger things on our minds.

45 posted on 09/04/2003 12:38:10 AM PDT by Flyer (---[~~~]---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson