Skip to comments.
Did White House Release Misleading Information On 9-11 Air? White House Altered EPA Reports?
NBC Report ^
| 09-03-02
Posted on 09/03/2003 9:10:02 PM PDT by Brian S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
1
posted on
09/03/2003 9:10:03 PM PDT
by
Brian S
To: Brian S
So why were all of these changes made? Tinsley believes it was for security public relations. "We were told that a desire to reopen Wall Street and national security concerns were the reasons for changing the press releases," Tinsley said.
So, which was it, security, or public relations?
2
posted on
09/03/2003 9:17:14 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
To: Brian S
![](http://www.orlandosentinel.com/media/photo/2002-09/4528304.jpg)
White House employee at "unsafe site".
3
posted on
09/03/2003 9:22:21 PM PDT
by
isthisnickcool
(See Jesse, see Jesse get arrested, see Jesse make bail and ride away in a limo.)
To: Brian S
Clinton passes on Bin Laden, causes 9/11, and we're worried now about air that was breathed two years ago?
Yeah, NBC has their priorities straight.
4
posted on
09/03/2003 9:22:33 PM PDT
by
exit82
(Constitution?--I got your Constitution right here!--T. Daschle)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
So, which was it, security, or public relations?
Both. The two are not mutually exclusive concepts. Imagine everyone afraid to go into New York City for months after 911 over the wording of an EPA report that had insufficient data anyway. That would have been really good for national security.
5
posted on
09/03/2003 9:23:41 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Well cetainly blame the Bush adminstration, not the terrorists for the bad air. That ought to be a great campaign strategy for the demonRATS.
6
posted on
09/03/2003 9:24:16 PM PDT
by
w1andsodidwe
(recycling is a waste of time for hardworking taxpayers, hire the homeless to sort garbage)
To: Brian S
Is the author of this article a former Soviet agent who kidnaps and rapes little kids? And when did the author stop beating his wife anyway?
We'll never know, but we do know you can make interesting headlines out of (mis)leading questions!
7
posted on
09/03/2003 9:24:44 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(Lower Taxes means economic growth)
To: Brian S
MSNBC carryin' Sillary's water again, huh?
8
posted on
09/03/2003 9:25:00 PM PDT
by
timpad
(Why won't they go away?)
To: Brian S
I think they did just fine. It's been years, and everyone is ok. The tests they did showed no problems.
Might better not panic the public because the air smells. Of course it would smell.
I think the Democrats (Hillary started this) are searching to make Bush look like a liar to justify Clinton. They want to make it look like "everybody does it." They also want law suits for their lawyer DNC donations. It'll also hurt the economy if they can pull it off. They're terrorists hiding behind the cover of " We only do it for you - the American people."
Unless they can portray Bush to be like Clinton (It'll never happen. He isn't anything like Clinton), they'll never get rid of little Billy's legacy.
In my opinion, this is nothing. It's like "Bush lied during the state of the union address", and that one fell flat on it's face. The Democrats are showing their true color - puke green.
9
posted on
09/03/2003 9:25:47 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: Arkinsaw
I agree with you, and understand your point.
But the author seems to suggest that these reasons are in conflict and that this means the WH did not handle the situation correctly.
I think the WH did the best that they could, with what they knew at the time.
10
posted on
09/03/2003 9:26:50 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
To: Brian S
This has got to be THE lamest attempt at stirring up a controversy that I have seen.
11
posted on
09/03/2003 9:29:12 PM PDT
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: Brian S
They used to call Pres. Reagan the Tefflon coated President because nothing the press or the DumieWits threw at him could stick.
This is just the latest at GW. Nothing they've thrown so far has stuck and in fact keeps landing and sticking back on them.
GW must be the "Force-Field" President.
12
posted on
09/03/2003 9:29:36 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: exit82
Clinton passes on Bin Laden, causes 9/11, and we're worried now about air that was breathed two years ago? Nonsense. Bin Laden and 19 hijackers cause 9/11. Clinton may have been negligent, but full blame must remain with Wahabbi fanatics. As to second point, this is serious issue, because many workers in Lower Manhattan area did not wear respirators that were available at time because they were told air was safe. As result, a great many have suffer heart and lung problems, including permanent disability. Blame EPA.
13
posted on
09/03/2003 9:29:38 PM PDT
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: Brian S
When all the tests on PCBs and particulates did come in, they did not raise any red flags So the tests came back ok?? .. then what is she complaining about??
Oh and Niki isn't from some watchdog group .. she is an Inspector General of the EPA .. who just happens to have been appointed by Bill Clinton
And who just happens to be speaking out 2 years later at the same time that Hillary Clinton was on her activists soap box screaming about emails at the white house
14
posted on
09/03/2003 9:31:26 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Brian S
What a non-story....
It wouldn't have mattered if the EPA announced that the air in New York was so toxic that prolonged exposure might kill you! The FDNY, NYPD and all the other first responders would not have left the scene.
Americans have always been their best when times are the worst and that will never change.
Those who want to politicize the events of 9/11 with meaningless accusations such as this one should be condemned by all Americans who can see through this abvious opportunism
15
posted on
09/03/2003 9:34:04 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(The Enemies of America can Count on the Democrats for Aid and Comfort)
To: Alter Kaker
This is not nonsense. The recents news is the book by Richard Miniter that shows that on many occassions, Clinton ignored getting Bin Laden or retaliating for other terrorist attacks in his eight year tenure. That enabled Bin Laden to survive and orchestrate 9/11. So, yes, Clinton is responsible for not protecting this nation, and for 9/11.
It may be nonsense to you, but it is fact to me.
16
posted on
09/03/2003 9:37:19 PM PDT
by
exit82
(Constitution?--I got your Constitution right here!--T. Daschle)
To: Brian S
"When all the tests on PCBs and particulates did come in, they did not raise any red flags."
Case closed. Its all about the monaay, as usual.
So, the first draft titles of press releases are never changed? These were the only exception.
There is a huge bullsh** scam in NYC about 'breathing' diseases... being perpetrated by some citizens, doctors, enviro whackos, politicians, civil rights groups, and LAWYERS. Its all about money and special interest group agendas.
You can take that to the bank.
To: Alter Kaker
Nonsense. Bin Laden and 19 hijackers cause 9/11. Clinton may have been negligent, but full blame must remain with Wahabbi fanatics. Clinton shares the blame .. there are documents to prove that on at least 12 occasion, he could have taken Bin Laden out and Clinton choose to ignore it. Because of his failure to be a leader, Bin Ladin was able to plan 9/11, The bombing of the USS Cole and others
Did Clinton fly those planes into those builds??
No he did not
But he also did nothing to prevent it from happening
18
posted on
09/03/2003 9:42:16 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: MJY1288; dogbyte12
It wouldn't have mattered if the EPA announced that the air in New York was so toxic that prolonged exposure might kill you! What about the chillrun?
To: Alter Kaker
"As result, a great many have suffer heart and lung problems, including permanent disability. "
BOO HOO HOO. This isn't Chernoble, Ivan.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson