Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
From Gillespie's "rebuttal"....

As I also pointed out, I worked with Newt Gingrich and Dick Armey in their effort to eliminate the federal Department of Education but these efforts were defeated. And so I noted that the issue is settled but I also noted that this administration has applied conservative principles to the now settled federal role in education, a point you neglected to mention.

The conservative principle would be that the Federal Government has NO role in education. The Union-Leader faithfully represented what Ed said.

180 posted on 09/03/2003 2:00:58 PM PDT by ksen (HHD;FRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: ksen
The conservative principle would be that the Federal Government has NO role in education. The Union-Leader faithfully represented what Ed said

So you are saying that in the future that the Fed Gov. cannot madate vouchers, with your above rhetoric.

181 posted on 09/03/2003 2:03:38 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

To: ksen
Defining conservatism down once again. Defining fiscal discipline down once again.
193 posted on 09/03/2003 2:38:48 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson