I made no statements to any such effect, nor so I believe any such thing.
Rendering A judgement in this case brought down an individuals wrath in delivering said judgement. Not Gods. Nothing you can say will change that, nor make it right with your own scripture.
I didn't say that it was right with my scripture, nor do I beleive that it is right with my scripture.
Feel free to sympathize with this murderer.
I don't and didn't say anything which could be construed as sympathy with this murderer
Even God won't call you down for that one. But to try to justify his actions cannot be done.
I didn't try to justify his actions.
Unless you like arguing what the definition of things like the word "is" would be.
I am arguing no such thing. Nor did I argue anything else that you accuse me of arguing.
All that happened here is that Alberta's Child made a logical (and I beleive false) argument that one can kill without rendering judgement in the biblical sense. He pointed out that the soldiers in Iraq are in fact killing without rendering judgement. What happened then is a bunch of people got all emotional and accusesd him of equating Hill with the soldiers in Iraq, when in fact he did no such thing. I simply pointed out that Alberta's Child argument that one can kill without rendering judgement in the biblical sense is in fact correct. You then got all emotional and accused me of a whole litany of things without any basis whatsoever.
Don't back up now. You were the one who said it is possible to "render a judgement without rendering judgement in the biblical sense". Hill did both. Period. The logic should be self evident. Unless you want to sit here and split semantic hairs over phraseology and completely disregard Hills actions and words as pertinent.
Comparing Hills actions to those of a soldier are not logical at all. The circumstances are completely different. Who was Hill in danger from? Was the doctor trying to attack him? Did the fetus, or the Mother of said fetus, request Hills aid?