To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Right right, a vote for Tom is a vote for Bustamante. That's gotten old. Most of your hatred of Tom McClintock has. I had nothing but respect for Mr. McClintock before he decided to derail the GOP's chances for victory, and soul his soul to the Indian Cosa Nostra. How is this "hatred"?
And YES, a vote for Tom is a vote for Aztlan. This is beyond question, no matter how "old" you think the concept is.
To: montag813
Nice rant. Now can you answer the only question posed? Thanks.
25 posted on
09/03/2003 9:53:48 AM PDT by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: montag813
I had nothing but respect for Mr. McClintock before he decided to derail the GOP's chances for victory, Tom announced his candidacy long before the movie star did. He had a plan to fix California's problems years ago - Arnold doesn't have one yet. It was Arnold that decided to derail the conservative's chances for victory - bought and paid for by the Kennedy clan.
29 posted on
09/03/2003 10:22:54 AM PDT by
Spiff
(Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: montag813
And YES, a vote for Tom is a vote for Aztlan. This is beyond question, no matter how "old" you think the concept is.Say montag813, if that were true, why was you post banned?
Still waiting on your answer as to whether (R)nold will raise taxes in the Golden State of California. *taps foot*
36 posted on
09/03/2003 10:39:15 AM PDT by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson