Without disrespect, I suggest you first practice looking up basic facts when ideas occur to you, and trying to incorporate them into your thinking. Otherwise, there is little point in taking on complex research projects.
Some of most interesting and valuable discoveries in the field of science have occurred when the scientist threw all former facts and thinking out the door.
New ideas do not always come from following old facts.
Have you ever had the EUREKA principle hit you? Let me ask you, where does this come from?
As far as the rest of your reply, I am currently searching for correlations, although I do not expect any.
I know exactly what causes the magma to change flow, what causes these eruptions. I know and understand the force involved, and it is all part of the main force in our galaxy, the sun, our star bright. The ozone, the holes, the magnetic field, the tectonic plates and their movement, many, many things. All part of a central force's change in magnitude, all part of life on Earth.
Am I right? Who the heck knows.
Scientists say that all the galaxies are receding from us, based on observation, and that we can tell their distance based on the red-shift. I dispute the theory completely and say their distance calculations are mostly junk. Who is correct? Well, since I don't have a better answer, I should shut up.
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planets.html
It has a chart of the gravitational effect of the moon and the planets on the earth.
Moon = 1
Jupiter = .01
Venus = .006
Saturn = .0007
Mars = .0002
Three planets have more effect on the earth than Mars.
Mars pull is .02% (two one-hundreths of one percent) than that of the moon.
In other words, the moons pull is 5000 times stronger and the tide produced by Mars is one millionth that of the moon.