Then expect me to snap back. BTW, you're doing a fine job convincing people to vote for anyone but McClintock.
I don't appreciate your term "clueless dorks" from one of the gang that can't shoot straight.
This from a guy cheerleading for a guy who's lost both statewide races he's been in, and couldn't be bothered to check the box necessary to get included in the voter information pamphlet. For someone on his third statewide race, that last part is inexcusably stupid. Next thing you know, he'd spell his name incorrectly while vetoing a bill, and it would go into law.
You don't seem troubled by your friends' error in the least or apologetic?
I know nothing of the matter, so I'm not going to comment on it until I do. I leave commenting from an ignorant point of view to your capable hands.
You seem to have liberal tendencies; maybe Michael Savage needs to help you.
Are you still trying to convince me that (a) McClintock has a prayer and (b) that I should vote for him?
Gratuitous insults are not an effective means of accomplishing that goal. But, if you're inside the McClintock campaign, you well know that effectiveness is not considered a necessary trait by the leadership.