Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McClintock Key to Democratic Victory in California
Intellectual Conservative.com ^ | 9/2/3 | Bob Chandra

Posted on 09/02/2003 4:21:28 PM PDT by socal_parrot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 741-760 next last
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Hey, we didn't go to the DU, the DU came to us. Unbelievable with these Ah-nold liberal creeps. :-|
381 posted on 09/02/2003 7:07:06 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah


"There you go again."

382 posted on 09/02/2003 7:08:23 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
you drinking fmj's kool aide or some other fluid of his?

reagan was no dark horse conservative, but a guy with pop-culture name recognition and crossover appeal

arnold has never been a dem and always touted himself as a republican

sure you didn't leave an 'l' out of your login name? looking forward to tokin' free pot in the new aztlan?

MechaClintock and, by extension his entire herd, are bustamante's useful idiot contingent
383 posted on 09/02/2003 7:08:29 PM PDT by dwills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
Label him all you want, McClintock was still the highest vote-getter of any Republican running statewide last year. I know you guys hate having that FACT pointed out.
384 posted on 09/02/2003 7:08:41 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Label him all you want, McClintock was still the highest vote-getter of any Republican running statewide last year. I know you guys hate having that FACT pointed out.

Yep, and that won him which job???

385 posted on 09/02/2003 7:09:27 PM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
McClintock's stubborn little self-centered ego trip will not be rewarded. Arnold will defeat him and Cruz both.
He need not drop out.
386 posted on 09/02/2003 7:10:20 PM PDT by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
McClintock was still the highest vote-getter of any Republican running statewide last year

And that is an indication he can win the highest office in the state? Let me help you out...NOPE.
387 posted on 09/02/2003 7:10:34 PM PDT by Registered (Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican

It's hard to argue against success, eh? ;-)

388 posted on 09/02/2003 7:10:37 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
It's all you guys have left. When will your hate for Republicans ever end ?
389 posted on 09/02/2003 7:10:57 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Lose the libel, outsider. You are exhibiting troll behaviors.

390 posted on 09/02/2003 7:12:03 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
I know another fact.

That was the SECOND time he LOST!

By the way, I just noticed how the LA Times is labeling Tom McClintock as a "maverick." Isn't that what they reffered to John McCain as???

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/trib/20030825/lo_latimes/mcclintockconvincedpersistencewillpayoff
391 posted on 09/02/2003 7:12:35 PM PDT by Tempest (If you lay off of Arnold, I'll lay off of Tom. Bustamante is the real danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I have read this whole thread without commenting. I am ashamed to see you stoop to the name calling that has been prevalent in these arguments.

What happened to Reagan's 11th Commandment? And don't try dodging by saying that Arnold isn't a "real" Republican. He has been a registered Republican since he could first vote in this country. He has campaigned for Republican candidates, and has called himself a Republican in Hollywood when it was certainly not a help to his career.

You are not from Caliornia, and neither am I. This election does affect the nation however, and I will once again say why.

If Bustamante wins, or if Davis survives the recall, it will first of all make Republicans look foolish and as big a sore losers as the Goreons of 2000. In addition, California's economic collapse will continue, sending shockwaves across the country.

Then, when there is no other alternative, after raising taxes and having sunk themselves in the bond market, the democrats will DEMAND that Bush bails them out. This will happen right in time for the November, 2004 election.

Then we will have the same purists on here demanding that California be told to go pound sand, its all their fault, and Bush should stick to his principles.

It will probably cost him not only California's votes but maybe those in a few other states, and could tip the election to the Rat.

I have come to the point that I don't care which person wins, but it is vital for a Republican to win. I think McClintock doesn't have as good a chance because he can't draw any crossover votes, but at least I can say that other than my questioning of his campaign tactics, I have never said anything ill about him.

I know I said this last night, but I am trying to get people to see this election as more than just a personal "my way or the highway" moment.

And please stop calling people names. It makes your position look very weak.

392 posted on 09/02/2003 7:13:01 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
People from Tennessee had a RINO Governor for 8 years who lied to us about everything, including taxes. You could apparently learn from us. Or Illinois, or New Jersey, or Taxachusetts...
393 posted on 09/02/2003 7:13:07 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Tom McClintock is the ONLY Conservative Republican in this race. Tom represents exactly what this state needs to overcome the tide of socialism spewing forth from Sacramento. To date Arnold has refused to sign a "NO TAXES" pledge, that speaks volumes about Arnold as a governor of this state. Yet, Tom McClintock has signed that pledge. There should be no question who would make the better governor.
ARNOLD = BUSTAMEChA-LITE

Vote Tom McClintock.

394 posted on 09/02/2003 7:14:19 PM PDT by Duramaximus (Freedom Loving American Living In A State That Worships Socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
I'm sorry, but the Republican base is not supporting Arnold. Arnold and McClintock have entirely different constituencies.
395 posted on 09/02/2003 7:14:31 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah ("Anyone who votes for Schwarzeneggar has a short in their system." - my mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I don't care who you are. Orange County lions club or the commie reds country club. A vote for Arnold is a vote for a liberal RINO.

A vote for Tom McClintock is a vote for a conservative Republican.

396 posted on 09/02/2003 7:15:15 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine; Canticle_of_Deborah
Sorry, dude. Without Conservatives, you got the MA GOP. Willie Weld's dream. Count how many Republicans occupy offices other than Governor up there.
397 posted on 09/02/2003 7:15:23 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad; KellyAdmirer
KA's analysis pointed out a major major problem: that one group would never ever vote for the same candidate as another group.

Actually, this is why Republicans don't win state wide offices in California. This is a problem, but it doesn't have to be that way. The whole point should be that all conservative, moderate, liberal Republicans should unite and have all of them support the candidate who can beat the Democrat candidate.

If the various groups would unite, those numbers add up.

If you have 35% Arnold, 12% McC and 45% Bustamante on Oct. 7, Bustamante wins and it's because of the split Republican vote. Clearly, if the McClintock voters would unite behind Arnold, then Arnold would get 47% to Bustamante's 45% and we all win, and Bustamante loses.

It is simple math.
398 posted on 09/02/2003 7:15:50 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I'd prefer to let Cali simmer under Dim management if we can't elect a conservative.

And thanks to your type we got 8 years of Clinton and still had to fight like @#$% to avoid Gore. "Simmering" never works - once the RATs are in control, they take things way farther to the left than we ever have a chance of reversing.

399 posted on 09/02/2003 7:16:05 PM PDT by Spyder (Just another day in Paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I can't wait to remind them of this the day after the election.
400 posted on 09/02/2003 7:16:16 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 741-760 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson