Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SpaceShipOne - One step closer to the X Prize
Aviation Week and Space Technology ^ | Sept 1, 2003 | Aviation Week and Space Technology

Posted on 09/02/2003 3:52:27 PM PDT by Young Werther

The first "feather" conversion of Scaled Composites' SpaceShipOne rocket plane was achieved during its second gliding flight on Aug. 27 (AW&ST Aug. 18, p. 32). Officials plan to make the first showing of inflight video at the Society of Experimental Test Pilots (SETP) symposium in Los Angeles Sept. 25-27 (www.setp.org).

After being dropped from its mother ship at 48,200 ft. and 105 kt., pneumatic actuators raised SpaceShipOne's aft wing and tail booms up to a 65-deg. angle, placing the vehicle in a high-drag angle of attack of about 70 deg. in a near-vertical descent exceeding 10,000 fpm. This high-drag configuration is intended to slow the rocket plane in the upper atmosphere as it returns from a 100-km. (328,000-ft.) vertical space journey.

The body attitude initially pitched up steeply as the tails continued to fly straight, then slowly dropped to near horizontal as the flight path fell. The pitchup caused the most "pucker factor" of the flight. "It didn't seem like it was going to fall away," general manager and test pilot Mike Melvill said. There was some rolloff during the feather entry but it was easily controlled and he felt any residual angle would be damped out by the stable configuration. He reported that rudders were most effective in turning the aircraft but differential elevator (aileron) also had an effect, and that normal elevator had little effect on the stable flight path. There was buffeting, which was expected. Indicated airspeed was about 60 kt.

After about 70 sec., Melvill commanded the actuators to return the vehicle back to normal glider configuration, which made the nose drop about 30 deg. below the horizon and airspeed increase to 120-125 kt., at which point the feather downlock was actuated. The feather maneuver was started at 43,000 ft. and 90 kt., and ended at 30,000 ft. It was preceded by a full stall test, which showed a 70-kt. stall speed at 19-deg. angle of attack at a forward center-of-gravity light weight with no propellant on board.

The remainder of the busy 10.5-min. flight included expanding the envelope to 200 kt. and 3.4g, and performing a 360-deg. roll. A wind shift prompted a change in landing runway from 30 to 12, which was handled readily by the avionics providing guidance to the new high key point. The winds shifted again, giving a slight tailwind on final, and Melvill used the brakes for the first time on rollout, reporting that they had good directional control.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: goliath; space; spacetourism; xprize
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Moose4
I have given up on NASA.
21 posted on 09/02/2003 5:44:57 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Now if we could just get the gov't to give up on NASA and let private industry loose, you just might get your dream.
22 posted on 09/02/2003 5:55:42 PM PDT by uglybiker (Backwards words say to used I. Again go I there! $#!& oh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Aside from LEO, there won't be many people in space for a long time to come

From LEO everything else is gravy. And once someone like the Chinese or even the Brazilians puts someone in orbit for reasons other than national pride (e.q. war or money) there will be a mad scramble by the rest of the world to catch up.

Watch. You'll see. It may take twenty years or so, but it will happen.

23 posted on 09/02/2003 6:10:02 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
With the tail raised at 100 knots, the airplane flies nearly ballistic. What about when it returns from 100 kilometers? Will it be so controllable at a much higher speed?

I believe the speed at altitude will still be relatively slow. Remember, they are going into space, not orbit.

24 posted on 09/02/2003 6:10:03 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: irv
And once someone like the Chinese or even the Brazilians puts someone in orbit for reasons other than national pride (e.q. war or money) there will be a mad scramble by the rest of the world to catch up.

But even our own military has given up on the idea that manned spaceflight is militarily advantageous. The Brazilians only interest in rockets is to get into the nuclear blackmail business. If the Chicoms ever get a man into space it will be on Russian hardware, and forty years behind schedule.

25 posted on 09/02/2003 6:15:32 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
I still have dreams of going into space. The bad part it is not going to happen :(

You obviously don't want to go bad enough to get rich enough to make it happen either through buying a ticket on a Soyuz or investing in many of the struggling commercial space launch companies trying to make space access more affordable.

Blindly supporting doomed NASA programs is pushing you away from your alledged goal of traveling into space.

26 posted on 09/02/2003 6:28:18 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
But even our own military has given up on the idea that manned spaceflight is militarily advantageous.

They'll change their minds when they realize that a couple guys in a decent space plane or shuttle, can knock out half the satellites we have in a few days.

Or when someone brings home some minerals drilled out of asteroids, and starts shooting at anyone else who tries to do the same thing.

27 posted on 09/02/2003 6:28:32 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
We need to pressure our government officials to open up space travel to private industry.
28 posted on 09/02/2003 6:42:00 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: irv
Watch. You'll see. It may take twenty years or so

Been there, done that. In '65 I was actually in the space program. It's somebody else's turn.

29 posted on 09/02/2003 7:10:23 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
the speed at altitude will still be relatively slow

It's going to hit the atmosphere at 3000 mph. That would strip the chrome right off the front bumper of my Chevy.

30 posted on 09/02/2003 7:13:27 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
You'll get your chance to go. It may take about 25-30 years, but you should be able to simply buy a ticket by then and get a shot at staying at a large,rotating, 2001esque station too. I just finished reading "Spaceflight Revolution" written by David Ashford, CEO of Bristol Spaceplanes. He believes within 20-30 years that a "mature" RLV spaceplane will be possible that will enable orbital transport for $5,000 per person.

Spaceflight Revolution

31 posted on 09/02/2003 8:05:38 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
In '65 I was actually in the space program.

It was worth being part of then. Thank you for having put in the effort.

32 posted on 09/02/2003 8:34:58 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
looks like that thing steve austine crashed in you
pitch is out coming forward with the side stick then we can rebulid him we have the technoligy........
33 posted on 09/02/2003 9:03:14 PM PDT by al baby (Whos the dud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Please add me to the space ping list.
34 posted on 09/02/2003 11:37:35 PM PDT by yhwhsman ("Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small..." -Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
3 words for the US Military: Lunar Mass Driver.
Tell me such a thing has no worthy military applications.
35 posted on 09/03/2003 12:16:36 AM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
This Mike Melvill character has some large stainless ones... good LORD - freefalling in an unpowered and essentially untested prototype vehicle from a drop altitude of nine miles...
Huge, shiny, chrome-plated ones.
36 posted on 09/03/2003 12:22:42 AM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irv
You are correct irv, though I would have said "war and money!"

There are two choices, dominate the high ground, and slavery.

Hard to guess when, but certainly sooner or later! Twenty years or less seems about right.

37 posted on 09/03/2003 12:23:37 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I look at those machines and get an inkling of Rutan's thought. Beautiful. I look at a feature for a few minutes, trying to get into Burt's head, and sometimes I see. Notice the X-1 shape, copied from the old .50 projectile noted for it's smooth transition to and from supersonic flow. Notice the lack of stress risers, even in the windows. Burt is getting ready to build a full fledged re-entry vehicle!

Spaceship One may be controllable on reentry with very slight movement of the hinging rear assembly, giving lift enough to fly at the edge of the atmosphere at 18,000 miles an hourwith those high cord wings, flying higher to avoid over heating and lower as speed drops, a Sanger "Antipodal Bomber" reentry, with none of this 3,500 degree reletively low altitude, high air turbulance reentry of the Shuttle!

38 posted on 09/03/2003 12:50:10 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I look at those machines and get an inkling of Rutan's thought. Beautiful. I look at a feature for a few minutes, trying to get into Burt's head, and sometimes I see. Notice the X-1 shape, copied from the old .50 projectile noted for it's smooth transition to and from supersonic flow. Notice the lack of stress risers, even in the windows. Burt is getting ready to build a full fledged re-entry vehicle!

Spaceship One may be controllable on reentry with very slight movement of the hinging rear assembly, giving lift enough to fly at the edge of the atmosphere at 18,000 miles an hourwith those high cord wings, flying higher to avoid over heating and lower as speed drops, a Sanger "Antipodal Bomber" reentry, with none of this 3,500 degree reletively low altitude, high air turbulance reentry of the Shuttle!

And remember Zenit is ready to be launched by the six huge turbofans of a Antonov 225, way, way cheaper per ton than the Shuttle to LEO! We can do this now!

39 posted on 09/03/2003 1:14:03 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Sorry about the two nearly identical posts. Must have been a senior moment and a few beers!
40 posted on 09/03/2003 1:27:18 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson