Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hchutch
Actually, 36 megatons would barely make a large asteroid move at all.

What we'd really need for this issue is Orion--nuclear detonations boosting a HUGE payload. All you need for launching the damn thing is a chunk of the Earth that you don't mind turning into a radioactive wasteland. I vote for Tripoli, Libya. :o)

And then we use about 6,000 or so nukes to push the asteroid out of the ecliptic.
20 posted on 09/02/2003 1:24:31 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
I was thinking a series of direct surface impacts, 24-hour intervals.

Hit that thing three or four times, it will shatter and then the last blast will scatter the fragments.
29 posted on 09/02/2003 1:28:37 PM PDT by hchutch (The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
All you need for launching the damn thing is a chunk of the Earth that you don't mind turning into a radioactive wasteland. I vote for Tripoli, Libya. :o)

Actually, San Francisco is my first choice, followed by Mecca, Chappaqua, Paris, and Ottawa.

62 posted on 09/02/2003 2:20:49 PM PDT by justanotherfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson