Ed Gillespie the RNC chairman has said Republicans aren't still for limited government...

Rrush Limbaugh | 9/2/2003 | the Unveiled Lady

[The UnVeiled Lady]

Rush was just talking about the RNC Chairman who was interviewed in the Baltimore paper and he has said that the Republican party is no longer for limited government. Now the party will take a poll of what the people want and then will throw money at that special interest.

Let's give this guy a poll!!!

[The UnVeiled Lady]

To email a comment http://www.rnc.org/contact/contact.htm

[The UnVeiled Lady]

to call
202-863-8500 then press #1 for Constituant services and leave a comment

[The UnVeiled Lady]

to call
202-863-8500 then press #1 for Constituant services and leave a comment

[The UnVeiled Lady]

to FAX
202-863-8820

Sorry about the double post

[jbstrick]

Like Rush said... 15 years of work down the drain...

[goldstategop]

The RNC appears to have decided what's important is occupying the middle. You know, leave the Democrats with nothing to say.

[B Knotts]

Rove is reenergizing the Rockefeller wing.

[Pikamax]

funny way to get bigger government but with less tax money coming in.

[GraniteStateConservative]

[Sam Cree]

"the Republican party is no longer for limited government."

Not exactly news, I guess.

[Gritty]

Ed Gillespie doesn't speak for me. I simply don't want to be in bed with people who think this way. I may as well be french-kissing Schmuckie The Rat Schumer or Fat Teddy The Killer.

Maybe I need to take a closer look at the Constitution Party. I would rather vote with a loser I agree with than vote with a loser I disagree with!

[joesnuffy]

Im with Gillispie on this one...
Hopefully soon we will have only a large govt
and only one political party...and voting for it is mandatory...
then we dont have to go through all this agravation
and just sit back and enjoy our soma ration...
finger flipping lip going blp blp blp blp

[B Knotts]

Do you think Gillespie is right?

[Dane]

Rus was reading an editorial from the Manchester Union-Leader.

Even he stated that he doubted that Gillespie spoke in the tone of the editorial.

But Rush did use it for a weak springboard for his rant.

Ed Gillespie also has been recently interviewed by Limbaugh himself.

[Reagan Man]

Let's not jump to any conclusions here, just yet. Rush is upset and rightfully so. As a conservative, I'm upset, but lets see the actual article. If someone can find it. I find this out of character for Ed Gillispie.

[B Knotts]

Yep...you'll be able to just put your hat on backwards and watch football as our betters run our lives the way they should be run. :-(

This is starting to feel kinda like "The Empire Strikes Back."

[deport]

Baltimore paper ?


Which one........ Or is Rush referring to the Manchester Union Article of a couple of days ago that asserts the same but offers no quotes.....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/974547/posts?

[deport]

And the Editorial had ZERO Quotes in it from Ed.......

[B Knotts]

It is good, though, to always remain vigilant. I smell some of this (Gillespie's alleged sentiments) in the California recall race. Remember that the checked-pants Republicans initially opposed the recall effort, until they saw a chance to install one of their own.

[StriperSniper]

That's the one!