To: sarcasm
So what does this mean? Now that Bush is in office they have decided to look at the truth behind the numbers? Will the truth behind the numbers extend to the number of homeless? How about the numbers that kept the stock market artificially high? How about the accounting at the Dept. of Ed. during the Clinton years when even large accounting firms threw up their hands in despair?
3 posted on
09/02/2003 2:32:26 AM PDT by
patj
To: patj
Crudele has been criticizing the way the government calculates the unemployment rate for a number of years now - it did not start with the Bush administration.
4 posted on
09/02/2003 2:46:12 AM PDT by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: patj
ere's a list of some employment facts you might want to know and probably don't. These may come in handy if you want to depress a date, scare a colleague or bore a friend.
Talking points for the 9 numbnuts running for President, make then ten when we add Hillary. Does anyone think electing one of those would solve our problems in the economy? I hope not.
5 posted on
09/02/2003 2:54:45 AM PDT by
doosee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson