Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
Dude what are you talking about. Your posts get more non-sensical. We are talking about the destruction of our manufacturing base. You are unable to grasp that. You think it is hunky dory.

Your question is stupid and a complete non-sequitor.
72 posted on 09/03/2003 5:34:08 PM PDT by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Nov3
No they are extremely sensible. I'll pose it again, as simply as I can:

You maintain we are "losing" manufacturing jobs. OK, for us to have "lost" jobs, when did all these jobs appear? Just give me a decade. When did we have massive manufacturing job growth since 1970?

This is critical because if you say that all these manufacturing jobs came in the Carter years, you must then credit the extremely high taxes of the Carter years. Therefore, I assume your "solution" to job loss is to raise taxes.

If you say the job growth occurred in the Reagan years (which is what I say) then you have a problem, because Reagan cut taxes, and had almost NO protective tariffs on anything. (Briefly, on Harleys, briely on some cars---never on computers or high tech, which was the most rapidly growing sector, or on steel, which lost jobs).

If you say that the job growth occurred during the Clinton years, then you must credit NAFTA, which I don't think you want to do.

There is a fourth alternative that I know you don't want to face: we might not have EVER changed our share of mfg. jobs since 1950.

73 posted on 09/04/2003 6:35:07 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson