Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Quote:

While Moore and his lawyers argued that the Ten Commandments monument was permitted under the First Amendment, the legal battleground ultimately shifted to a fight over states' rights — to the dismay of some of the judge's supporters.

In large measure, the Civil War was fought to settle the issue of whether the federal government was sovereign over state governments. In the 1950s and 1960s, during the civil rights movement, Alabama and other pro-segregation states in the South raised the same issue — also without success.

The question was settled at Gettysburg and at Appomattox — it's time to stop re-fighting the states'-rights battle.

14 posted on 09/01/2003 1:00:44 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc
No it was, just cause there have been a few skrimishes in the constitionality of states rights.

The pesky 10th amendment still exits.

17 posted on 09/01/2003 1:07:31 PM PDT by dts32041 ("moderate Arab" he's the one who detonates his bomb via remote control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
The question was settled at Gettysburg and at Appomattox — it's time to stop re-fighting the states'-rights battle.

Well that's one view. Here's another.

It's time to stop worshiping at the altar of the elitist, asshole oligarchs in robes.

19 posted on 09/01/2003 1:10:21 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson