Skip to comments.
Rural towns feel chill of shutdowns: Maytag's exit in Galesburg shows globalization's ills
Chicago Tribune ^
| September 1, 2003
| James P. Miller
Posted on 09/01/2003 4:35:54 AM PDT by sarcasm
GALESBURG, Ill. -- More than a year remains before Maytag Corp. finally pulls the plug on its 1,600-worker refrigerator factory here.
But already, economic shock waves from the planned shutdown have begun to ripple outward from this prairie town, killing the jobs of hundreds of non-Maytag workers and threatening to claim as many as 2,000 more, including nurses, postal workers, mechanics and schoolteachers whose work has no connection with the appliance maker.
For decades, growth-minded rural towns have vied to attract manufacturers by offering tax breaks and other incentives. The expansion strategy is based on what economists call the "multiplier effect": When a new employer comes to town, the influx of new payroll money creates jobs throughout the local economy, as workers begin buying new homes, cars, and other goods and services.
Now, with manufacturers closing U.S. plants and switching production to cheap-labor sites in Mexico and China, the multiplier is working in reverse. The attribute that has long made manufacturing so attractive to communities--its ability to spark an outsize number of new jobs--is magnifying the economic disruption caused by manufacturer pullouts.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: globilization; manufacturing; maytag; refrigerators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-180 next last
1
posted on
09/01/2003 4:35:54 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
It would be interesting to see what actions the Union Workers have taken to keep their jobs in Galesburg. I cannot belive the workers just found out about this closing.
To: BooBoo1000
Should they offer to reduce their pay to $ 5.00/day?
3
posted on
09/01/2003 5:07:39 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: sarcasm
"Should they offer to reduce their pay to $ 5.00/day?"
Of course not. What they need to do is to enact tariffs driving the cost of refrigerators to a level that will support their current wages. I'm sure their neighbors will be happy to pay much more for their refrigerators to save these union jobs. Of course, the increase in costs will mean can't pay for other things, but, after all, using the power of government to extort money from your neighbor is the American way, is it not?
To: DugwayDuke
Let me know when Maytag reduces their prices.
5
posted on
09/01/2003 5:26:42 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: BooBoo1000
I didn't read the whole article because I do not feel like registering with the Chicago Tribune.
Were these, in fact, union jobs?
Not that it really matters, now.
It's not just white collar jobs leaving.
6
posted on
09/01/2003 5:52:45 AM PDT
by
baltodog
To: sarcasm
Kenmore and Frigidaire still manufacture washers and dryers in the U.S. Anyone else?
7
posted on
09/01/2003 5:55:19 AM PDT
by
Balto_Boy
To: DugwayDuke
I'm sure their neighbors will be happy to pay much more for their refrigerators to save these union jobs. I also want to pay more for steel and wood. Not to mention shoes, TV's, peanuts, sugar, and carbon fiber. In fact, let's protect everything...
8
posted on
09/01/2003 5:55:30 AM PDT
by
Drango
(To Serve Man ... IT'S A COOKBOOK!)
To: Drango
"I also want to pay more for steel and wood. Not to mention shoes, TV's, peanuts, sugar, and carbon fiber. In fact, let's protect everything..."
You will soon get your wish, wages are in a general downtrend so the effect will be the same as price increases, you will have to work more hours to buy the same product. If you have not had your wage cut yet, be patient, it will be coming to a factory near you soon.
9
posted on
09/01/2003 6:02:26 AM PDT
by
RipSawyer
(Mercy on a pore boy lemme have a dollar bill!)
To: Willie Green
ping
10
posted on
09/01/2003 6:21:20 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is slavery)
To: sarcasm
Enact tariffs on all imported goods and I can assure you, the prices on all goods covered by the tariffs will go up. That is the point, isn't it? Increase the price to protect jobs and wages?
To: sarcasm
bump for the continuing export of jobs...
To: DugwayDuke
When is Maytag going to reduce prices to reflect the lower cost of labor in their Mexican plant?
13
posted on
09/01/2003 6:36:29 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: sarcasm
Should they offer to reduce their pay to $ 5.00/day? Obviously they should because that's the only way they're going to compete with Mexicans which have a $4.50 minimum pay. Give up health care benefits too.
14
posted on
09/01/2003 6:37:37 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: A. Pole
One up your alley.
To: DugwayDuke
Oh yeah, I'm sure Maytag will cut their prices by two thirds when their products are made overseas by people living in cardboard boxes in Mexico and slave labor in Red China! HA HA HA!
To: DugwayDuke
the prices on all goods covered by the tariffs will go upThey don't go down when they export the jobs. There should be a tax on all products made outside of the US to make up the difference that American businessmen are forced to pay in taxes, regulation compliance, Workers Comp, Social Security and the rest that make doing business here too costly.
17
posted on
09/01/2003 6:40:29 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: BooBoo1000
Oh, the typical actions of the big unions. Antagonize management. Thuggery. Strikes. Demands for job security. Featherbedding.
18
posted on
09/01/2003 6:41:26 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: FITZ
Obviously they should because that's the only way they're going to compete with Mexicans which have a $4.50 minimum pay. Give up health care benefits too. So who, with Mexicans making 4.50 an hour and paying for their own health care, and Americans out of work, is going to buy these products?
To: FITZ
The remaining taxpayers will pay for their health care when they go on Medicaid.
20
posted on
09/01/2003 6:42:50 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-180 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson