I saw no indication FastCoyote was advocating censorship, rather than making an observation on the behaviour the TaliBornAgain seem to get away with on FR.
So you missed the word "banned". Of course. See No evil, Hear No Evil...
When I see the letters L-I-B-E-R... I know that I am dealing with someone who probably has a social disease but most certainly has a moral and mental disease.
First of all, the "Taliban" characterization. This must be the updated version of Godwin's Law for the Taliban and Christianity have nothing in common, so you must be wanting to sling around the Nazi thing, but settled on this more politically correct and empty headed euphemism.
Second. Libertarianism is rebellion. The philosophy is anti-Christ;, it is basically immoral; it celebrates every form of vice from prostitution, to pornography, to drug abuse, to sodomy; it hates authority and is a kissing fornicating cousin to anarchy.
I know that you folks want to hide the fact that Libertarianism is engaged in an outright jihad against the American culture, wishing to replace it with third world chaos. But when someone like me shines the light of truth on your seditionist intents, you folks do like your bretheren in the Liberal Left and start talking about banning speech. Your cultural deconstructionalism and fast track approach to the formation of a totally depraved fragmented society is just as obvious as the Left's Socialism.
The selfishness and total elimination of a social and moral conscience is apparent, that I lay odds that if I were to get a few Libertarians in a room together and talk about the legal necessity of auto insurance you folks would in short order get into a fist-fight. Some would claim that the insurance mandate is a government/business racket, imposing a costly system of control upon a free people - a few would point out that Thomas Jefferson and all of the other Founding Diests never imposed an insurance system on horses and buggies and thus a freedom loving people shouldn't have it either. Then another group would say that not having insurance imposes a fraud on the rest and that through a Libertarian endorsed system of Prior Restraint, and a legal precedence for "Presumption of Guilt" everyone should be required by the police powers of the State to have compulsory auto insurance. Of course, there would be even more goof-ball rhetoric as each person was trying to rationalize his or her own personal wants and needs and how to impose his or her beliefs on everyone else.
That's why I love you people. Just like a mother can love her toddler composing a symphony in the kitchen by banging pots and pans.