Skip to comments.
Missed The Point {Charley Reese}
King Features Syndicate, Inc. ^
| 09/01/2003
| Charley Rese
Posted on 09/01/2003 3:56:08 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
All, Charley "gets it". Peace and love, George.
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
He's one of the few who do get it.
2
posted on
09/01/2003 3:59:58 AM PDT
by
exnavy
To: exnavy; George Frm Br00klyn Park
Both of you can expect to be reviled and hated, GFBP for posting it and agreeing with it, and exnavy for agreeing with it.
He is right, though, no matter how many RINOs and neocons hate him for it.
3
posted on
09/01/2003 4:04:40 AM PDT
by
LibertarianInExile
(The scariest nine words in the English Language: We're from the government. We're here to help you.)
To: harpseal; blackie; madfly; editor-surveyor; sauropod
It is even incorrect to speak of "constitutional rights." The Constitution does not give anyone any rights. It merely prohibits the government from abrogating or abridging rights the people already have. That, too, is clear from the text if you read it.
================================
Guys, "That" is IT, in a "nutshell", Though "infringed" could have been added to "abrogating or abridging". Why is it that "honorable" HIGHLY educated judges Don't "get it"??? And, maybe even less educated legislators and presidents?? Peace and love, George.
To: LibertarianInExile
This country started moving away from states rights long ago, we need to move back in that direction.
5
posted on
09/01/2003 4:09:24 AM PDT
by
exnavy
To: exnavy
"Why is it that "honorable" HIGHLY educated judges Don't "get it"???"
George, your post is on the mark. Now, about those '"honorable" HIGHLY educated judges' - show me one. My great, great, great, great grandfather and a couple dozen others of his close relatives who fought in the Revolution did so in vain? Not if we stand tall and together stop the carnage that would abrogate all rights in favor of governmental dictating and control of every aspect of our lives.
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
It's always a good feeling when others express the same opinion as mine.I'm just never as good about putting it so succinctly into words.State's Rights are SO important.
7
posted on
09/01/2003 4:34:57 AM PDT
by
Jackknife
(.......in a constant search for wisdom.....)
To: jakkknife
I do not believe that it is only about "States Rights". States are also prone to abrogate our rights. They are no less guilty than the feds.
To: LibertarianInExile
It is possible that Charley is both correct and a complete raving lunatic.
9
posted on
09/01/2003 4:44:51 AM PDT
by
Mr. Bird
To: LibertarianInExile; George Frm Br00klyn Park; exnavy; hellinahandcart; countrydummy; Jeff Head; ...
Yep. And Yep to George's observations.
I don't always agree w/ Charley but he is usually a "must read."
10
posted on
09/01/2003 5:08:53 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("How do you know he's a king?" "Because he doesn't have sh*t all over him.")
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
The result of a Godless society is..
No inalienable rights
11
posted on
09/01/2003 5:28:24 AM PDT
by
Vinnie
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
People either prefer federal judges making law or they don't -- I don't!
Neither should anyone else -- but they do.
12
posted on
09/01/2003 5:31:03 AM PDT
by
RAY
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
I am glad you found this and posted it. Charley Reese has the ability to cut through all the fluff and get to the heart of an issue.
I was in a discussion on this subject Saturday and I wish I had this article then. Reese expressed my opinion on the topic much better than I did.
13
posted on
09/01/2003 6:08:29 AM PDT
by
Naomi4
To: exnavy
>>...This country started moving away from states rights long ago, we need to move back in that direction...<<
The 17th Amendment to the Constitution was one of the final "nails in the coffin" of State's Rights.
Prior to that Amendment, U.S. Senators were elected by their State's Legislature to represent the State's interests in Congress.
Afterwards, the Senators were elected by the populace of the State and thus began the current "popularity" contests we have now.
14
posted on
09/01/2003 6:52:27 AM PDT
by
FReepaholic
(www.september-11-videos.com Never Forget.)
To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
......nor do I think it is all about states' rights. It is up to the locals to make sure their local leaders are not corrupt or leading them in the wrong direction. I wasn't just simplifying it.......
15
posted on
09/01/2003 7:35:59 AM PDT
by
Jackknife
(.......in a constant search for wisdom.....)
To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
States are also prone to abrogate our rights
Like what's going on in Alabaster, Alabama. Some low income minorities are getting their property taken under "iminent domain" so the city can give it to a pivate developer who has promised higher tax revenues for the city if they take the land from the current owners and give it to them. They have decided that higher tax revenues for their "programs" constitutes "public use".
Or, using the NY blackout as an excuse get ready to see more property takings to accomodate power companies and stringing high voltage power lines.
Between taxes, eviornmentalist and tax and spend governments there is no "private property" in this country.
16
posted on
09/01/2003 7:41:31 AM PDT
by
BabsC
To: tscislaw
The 17th and the 16th Amendments pretty much nullified the Cconstitution.
17
posted on
09/01/2003 7:43:12 AM PDT
by
BabsC
To: BabsC
pivate developer ------ private developer.
18
posted on
09/01/2003 7:45:43 AM PDT
by
BabsC
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
Mr. Reese gets it right, again. But thanks to that bonehead, Lincoln and his ilk, America will never be what our Fathers had intended it to be.
Great article.
19
posted on
09/01/2003 8:01:58 AM PDT
by
A2J
To: exnavy
This country started moving away from states rights long ago, we need to move back in that direction.That will only happen after another Civil War.
20
posted on
09/01/2003 8:03:56 AM PDT
by
A2J
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson