Skip to comments.
Pressure's on Senator to Drop Out of Race, but Why Should He?
LA Times ^
| 9-1
| Skelton
Posted on 09/01/2003 3:08:07 AM PDT by ambrose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
09/01/2003 3:08:07 AM PDT
by
ambrose
To: kellynla; DoctorZIn; Rabid Republican
What McClintock does say is that "I'm definitely a very strong gravitational pull on Arnold's political philosophy" - pulling it to the right. But, he adds, "I'm very concerned about the direction he would take California, given his [former Wilson] advisors and his reluctance to forthrightly answer simple questions about simple policies." Before anybody asks McClintock to step aside, Schwarzenegger should prove he can run without stumbling.
2
posted on
09/01/2003 3:10:13 AM PDT
by
ambrose
(If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: ambrose
Good column.
4
posted on
09/01/2003 3:18:30 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
I think we should make it a rule that on articles that require a login name and password that both are supplied.
5
posted on
09/01/2003 3:37:43 AM PDT
by
BushCountry
(To the last, I will grapple with Democrats. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at Liberals.)
To: BushCountry; Jim Robinson
I think we should make it a rule that on articles that require a login name and password that both are supplied.That would be a bad idea. The reason FR can only use excerpts is because the Slimes claimed that using full-length articles gave surfers options other than going through its website.
After a long legal battle, a judge left FR intact as long as only excerpts from the Times and the Washed-up Post were used. The Times wanted to destroy FR. Posting passwords to avoid registration would be an invitation to another suit.
6
posted on
09/01/2003 3:48:05 AM PDT
by
L.N. Smithee
(Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
To: BushCountry
One day I sat down and registered to papers from Australia to Great Britain.It has ended my frustration!It doesn't take that long and you don't have to supply real info!
7
posted on
09/01/2003 3:48:58 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Aunt Enna
Many many of my friends say it's McClintock or nothing. Well that's not true. They'll get 4 more years of Busty, who will make Davis look like Reagan.
To: MEG33
Moreover, says GOP strategist Ken Khachigian, McClintock's "not making a fool of himself. He can say, 'I'm running a principled race. Why should I get out? I've paid my dues. What's Arnold's claim on the office?' "
What McClintock does say is that "I'm definitely a very strong gravitational pull on Arnold's political philosophy" pulling it to the right. But, he adds, "I'm very concerned about the direction he would take California, given his [former Wilson] advisors and his reluctance to forthrightly answer simple questions about simple policies."
Before anybody asks McClintock to step aside, Schwarzenegger should prove he can run without stumbling.
The Los Angeles Times' liberal Sacramento bureau chief George 'Slumberin' Skelton makes some very good points. Tom paid his dues. When did Arnold? And why won't Arnold tell people about the issues at stake in this recall election? If Arnold can run an election without facing a "bimbo" eruption once a week and get the backing of most of party, Tom won't put his personal ego above the good of the party. But it's a little early to ask Tom to withdraw. He's a serious and thoughtful candidate and the voters deserve to hear whether they'd like to have what he proposes to do as Governor. And if it helps make Arnold more of a committed Republican, its an added bonus. For all of the above reasons, yes Tom should stay in the race. The chattering classes counted out Tim Pawlenty too. I have feeling that for Tom its a good place to be in cause Americans have always loved an underdog. So watch out for this guy.
9
posted on
09/01/2003 4:04:58 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: AmericaUnited
Well that's not true. They'll get 4 more years of Busty, who will make Davis look like Reagan
What is the diference between Arnie and Bill Clinton?
Clinton is ashamed of doing drugs and Gangbangs.
To: Common Tator
Clinton is not running for Govenor of Kalifornia.
To: Common Tator
You're one who always says better a RINO than a Rat when there's no alternative.
12
posted on
09/01/2003 4:09:17 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Common Tator
The plain, simple fact is that Kalifornia will go over the cliff head long under 4 years of Far-Left-Socialist-Davis (Busty).
McClintock will not win, (Yes, yes, I know if elephants can fly and all liberals, lefists, commies, conservatives, moderates, blah, blah, blah, unite behind him, HE CAN WIN!)
It's a two person race and people had better pick the better of the two. Greedy, all or nothing pigs wind up getting slaughtered.
To: AmericaUnited
Tim Pawlenty was the odd man out in a three man race. People sure aren't laughing now. I really really hope Tom gets skewered, ridiculed, laughed off, and dismissed. He needs to works under the radar like Bill Simon did last year. California is a land of miracles. Arnold and Large Breasts take the voters for granted, thinking they have this election in the bag. Au contraire.
14
posted on
09/01/2003 4:20:50 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: ambrose; dalereed
A 'GO, Tom McClintock' bump!
With a special 'Dale Reed Ping'.
15
posted on
09/01/2003 5:30:58 AM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(This is our OOL. If you'll notice there's no 'P' in it, let's keep it that way...)
To: goldstategop; Common Tator
Yes, Tator has some explaining to do. If there was ever a situation of picking between the better of two evils, this is it. None of the 'pure' Republicans has a prayer. Arnold is the only rational choice to prevent a permanent, continuation of Democrat control of California. It is now or never.
16
posted on
09/01/2003 7:08:46 AM PDT
by
Buffalo Head
(Illigitimi non carborundum)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: notorious vrc
I was being fair and balanced.I was not getting into who can win..McClintock doesn't seem like a McClinton,though.Where did that come from?
18
posted on
09/01/2003 7:20:53 AM PDT
by
MEG33
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: ambrose
Couldn't they make a deal and McClintock slide in as Lt. Governor? How does that work in Kalifornia?
20
posted on
09/01/2003 7:40:36 AM PDT
by
sargon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson