Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Noachian
We clearly disagree, and no they do not have the right to a tyranny of the majority no matter how sanctimonious they feel.
157 posted on 09/01/2003 4:01:44 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: risk
We clearly disagree, and no they do not have the right to a tyranny of the majority no matter how sanctimonious they feel.

You clearly seem to favor a tyranny of the minority, a justice system that makes up flavor-of-the-month laws, and inhibiting those "sanctimonious" people in Alabama from deciding, on their own, how the state of Alabama will be run.

Yes we do clearly disagree on what it means to be free, and going further with this discussion is pointless.
158 posted on 09/01/2003 4:12:14 PM PDT by Noachian (Legislation Without Representation Is Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson