Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shell to Avoid Oil Drilling at Sites Listed by Unesco
The New York Times ^ | August 31, 2003 | HEATHER TIMMONS

Posted on 08/31/2003 3:02:36 PM PDT by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

LONDON, Aug. 30 — One of the largest oil companies in the world, Royal Dutch/Shell, has promised to avoid exploring or drilling on sites that carry the United Nation's World Heritage designation. It is the first energy company to make such a promise.

Shell's decision comes a week after the International Council on Mining and Metals, a group of the world's 15 largest mining companies, said it would stop exploring or mining on World Heritage sites.

Taken together, the commitments are a "big step forward," said Dr. Mechtild Rossler, director of European heritage for Unesco, the United Nations agency that controls the program. "We would have liked to see a more global picture with the gas and oil industry, but Shell is a good starting point."

More than 170 countries take part in the World Heritage program, which was founded in 1972 to identify, protect and preserve cultural or natural areas that provide "outstanding value to humanity." The United States was the first country to sign on to the program.

A site is nominated by a local government, and the application is reviewed by Unesco, which can take as long as five years. If the site is approved, the 170 countries pledge to help protect it.

The oil and mining pledges are part of larger movement by corporations to designate some areas as "no go" zones, environmentalists said. Shell and the mining companies have "decided there is more shareholder value to their reputation than the resources" they could tap in World Heritage sites, said Rob Lake, director of corporate governance at Henderson's Global Investors in London, which manages $152 billion in assets.

Shell's promise is unlikely to have any effect on the company's current business because most World Heritage sites are not oil-rich. But the decision could have some practical effect. The Wadden Sea, an area with abundant natural gas off the coast of the Netherlands, is on the World Heritage's tentative site list, along with the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. President Bush's energy plan includes opening the Alaskan range to drilling.

Shell did have plans to explore for oil and gas in the Sundarbans region of Bangladesh, a World Heritage site since 1997 that houses the world's largest mangrove forest. It abandoned the idea in 2001 after pressure from environmentalists.

Sir Philip Watts, the Shell chairman, announced the plans in a speech at the headquarters of the World Conservation Union in Geneva on Thursday.

Some environmentalists said that they welcomed Shell's promise but that it did not go far enough. "It's such a small step, it is hard to rejoice," said Michael Brune, executive director of the Rainforest Action Network, an environmental group in San Francisco. "I suppose you could call it a conceptual breakthrough for an oil company to say it won't drill in the Grand Canyon or on the Galápagos Islands, but any school kid can tell you they shouldn't."

Mining, drilling and logging on World Heritage sites are not unheard of, and often cause bitter battles between international conservationists and local governments, which say the activities are dictated by economics. In 1998, the mining company Energy Resources of Australia started digging for uranium in Kakadu Park, a wetland in the Northern Territories that had been a World Heritage site since 1981. Loggers and environmentalists also have clashed over the use of a World Heritage-designated rain forest in Honduras.

In other instances, World Heritage sites have suffered when local governments do not have the resources to protect them.

Analysts say it is easier for Shell to rule out drilling in World Heritage sites than it is for its peers. "Shell has a much more diverse resource base" than the competition, with reserves it can tap around the world, said Doug Leggate, a Citigroup oil analyst.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: energy; environment; globalism; petroleum; shell; un; unwh

1 posted on 08/31/2003 3:02:36 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
World Heritage Sites (UNESCO) in the U.S.(Owned by the UN, not the USA)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
1978 Mesa Verde
1978 Yellowstone
1979 Grand Canyon National Park
1979 Everglades National Park
1979 Independence Hall
1980 Redwood National Park
1981 Mammoth Cave National Park
1981 Olympic National Park
1982 Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site
1983 Great Smoky Mountains National Park
1983 La Fortaleza and San Juan Historic Site in Puerto Rico
1984 Statue of Liberty
1984 Yosemite National Park
1987 Monticello and University of Virginia in Charlottesville
1987 Chaco Culture National Historic Park
1987 Hawaii Volcanoes National Park
1992 Pueblo de Taos
1995 Carlsbad Caverns National Park
2 posted on 08/31/2003 3:09:51 PM PDT by stylin19a (is it vietnam yet ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Shell did have plans to explore for oil and gas in the Sundarbans region of Bangladesh, a World Heritage site since 1997 that houses the world's largest mangrove forest. It abandoned the idea in 2001 after pressure from environmentalists.

*** As usual animals are more important than people. Wherever Dutch Shell drills, they bring thousands of jobs with them. For you liberals that means money in the pocket of poor people. Royal Dutch Shell employs many of my relatives down in the West Indies, and the living is even better than here on Long Island (in Wilhemstaad,Curacao that is).
3 posted on 08/31/2003 3:11:13 PM PDT by cyborg (i'm half and half... me mum is a muggle and me dad is a witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
"It's such a small step, it is hard to rejoice,"

Nothing makes them happy - I'd say go back to oxcarts, but then we'd be taking advantage of the poor dumb beasts so PETA would be in a snit, and the rest would complain about methane emissions.
4 posted on 08/31/2003 3:19:43 PM PDT by Felis_irritable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
Disgusting. You'd think that booting the U.N. out of these parts of America would have been a first priority of a Republican administration. What will it take I wonder?
5 posted on 08/31/2003 3:21:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
founded in 1972 to identify, protect and preserve cultural or natural areas that provide "outstanding value to humanity."

I'd say that energy production provides "outstanding value to humanity."

6 posted on 08/31/2003 3:26:26 PM PDT by eddie willers (I live in my own little world, but that's ok....they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
ping
7 posted on 08/31/2003 3:35:34 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
It's easy for stupid liberals who live in rich countries to say that. Try and talk about preserving the pristine oceans to poor people with no jobs or electricity.
8 posted on 08/31/2003 3:44:37 PM PDT by cyborg (i'm half and half... me mum is a muggle and me dad is a witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
LOL and choking...safe for Shell to agree not to drill ot the Statue of Liberty, etc!!!
9 posted on 08/31/2003 3:46:50 PM PDT by friendly ((Badges?, we don gots to show no stinkin' badges!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.

Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.

10 posted on 08/31/2003 4:07:10 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
It was Republican Nixon who hooked us up to this runaway.
11 posted on 08/31/2003 8:32:02 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
12 posted on 09/01/2003 3:07:43 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
bttt
13 posted on 09/01/2003 5:59:24 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Bump!
14 posted on 09/01/2003 12:50:57 PM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson