Skip to comments.
Girl wins $51.4 million for streetcar accident
The Times-Picayune ^
| 8/29/2003, 12:38 p.m. CT
| The Associated Press
Posted on 08/31/2003 3:40:39 AM PDT by gd124
Edited on 07/14/2004 12:59:56 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
The greed of some people sickens me. The kid didn't even lose her arm. How the hell is a streetcar driver who earns nothing ever going to pay $5.4 million?
Tort reform is needed now!
1
posted on
08/31/2003 3:40:39 AM PDT
by
gd124
To: gd124
He won't that really translates into the amount
the city is liable for.
The verdict will probably be reduced on appeal.
It not right away by the trial judge.
To: gd124
Greed, lack of personal responsibility, along with the victim mentality. It's one of the major diseases of our society.
3
posted on
08/31/2003 4:02:05 AM PDT
by
Dudoight
To: gd124
Greedy, parasitic lawyers are destroying jobs and our economy.
4
posted on
08/31/2003 4:12:08 AM PDT
by
tkathy
To: gd124
Kerrigan said blame for the girl's injuries lies with her parents, who should have been watching her more closely. Wrong! Parents are not responsible for watching their kids, the government is.
5
posted on
08/31/2003 4:38:48 AM PDT
by
Imal
(The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: gd124
How did she fall out of the window? I have ridden in street cars and busses, and I never ever fell out the window even one time?
To: gd124
Ya, bring on more regulation.
8
posted on
08/31/2003 5:36:21 AM PDT
by
Wayland
To: waterstraat
Maybe you can't fit out the window :o)
9
posted on
08/31/2003 5:39:09 AM PDT
by
RedBloodedAmerican
(http://media.emicmg.com/ffd42835/video/wma/500/ithankyou_remixvideo.asx)
To: Princeliberty
I agree that the trail court judge will probably reduce this before any appeal. If not, the appellate court will. That's one reason why we do not need any tort reform (more regulations).
10
posted on
08/31/2003 5:40:32 AM PDT
by
Wayland
To: gd124
I'm curious. Do you (people for limits on judgements) have problems with CEO's that make 600 times their average employee? Isn't it 'conservative' thought to get all you can get? If you can get it, you must deserve it?
I have my own thoughts on tort reform and the CEO issue, but I've always wondered how the difference would be explained here at FR. Thanks for the opportunity to find out.
11
posted on
08/31/2003 5:43:13 AM PDT
by
KCmark
(I am NOT a partisan.)
To: FoxFang
Also, Johnnie Cochran is that lawyer form the OJ trial, so I don't really take his opinion in high regard.
We're talking about lawsuits. Anyone who could get OJ off is someone whose opinion I would value highly ... as long as he is on my side.
12
posted on
08/31/2003 5:45:58 AM PDT
by
KCmark
(I am NOT a partisan.)
To: gd124
The city will appeal the and amount will be drastically reduced. Sounds to me the the city and driver should pay nothing. An irresponsible parent is to blame.
To: FoxFang
First of all, the street cars are historic vehicles whose charm would be likely be reduced by any modification, which would be fought by historic preservationists.
Second, what the hell was the jury thinking? Louisiana, supposedly, does not allow for punitive damages, so just how was this young lady going to have actual medical damages and actual economic damages equal to $51.4 million on a present value basis? I guess she was a tennis prodigy or something similar with expected earnings of over $1 million per year.
Third, why wasn't the person who hosted the party, with apparently inadequate supervision, assessed with any responsibility? One would think the driver should have been focused on the traffic situation while the party host tended to the partygoers. (Even Johnny Cochran would admit that the party host's lack of deep pockets made them an unattractive target.)
To: Poodlebrain
...just how was this young lady going to have actual medical damages and actual economic damages equal to $51.4 million on a present value basis?Well, you take Johnny's cut out of it and she actually ends up getting about $53.71/year. For the rest of her life, of course (Johnny's not that cold).
15
posted on
08/31/2003 7:08:49 AM PDT
by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: Poodlebrain
And if there were a fire in the car and the passengers couldn't get out because of the window restraints, then
lawyers would sue the transit authority for having installed them.
16
posted on
08/31/2003 7:15:59 AM PDT
by
tet68
To: KCmark
Do you (people for limits on judgements) have problems with CEO's that make 600 times their average employee? That is an issue for the shareholders of the individual corporations.
17
posted on
08/31/2003 7:20:35 AM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(The Federal Register is printed on pulp from The Tree Of Liberty)
To: novacation
It appears the jury ignored a recent Supreme Court ruling which set guidelines for economic vs punitive damages. The lower courts will find it all but impossible not to substanially reduce the award.
To: Wayland
Thats where you are wrong!!!!!!!!!!! The stupid kid and the stupid kids parents should not get jack shit.This should not have even made it to trial. BIG TORT REFORM NEEDED
19
posted on
08/31/2003 7:43:05 AM PDT
by
cksharks
To: KCmark
What the hell does the one have to do with the other?????????????????? I am curious to see what someone like you would say.
20
posted on
08/31/2003 7:45:29 AM PDT
by
cksharks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson