Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It was just a matter of time.
1 posted on 08/30/2003 5:48:17 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: xzins

56 posted on 08/30/2003 6:52:16 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Now, how do they justify this writing of the Apostle Paul to the Corinthians?
Corinth was a place where sex was a form of worship and sex and church went together. Priests and priestesses were there to be done to or be done by according to history. So Paul, who started the church there wrote them this letter.

1 Corinthians 6:13-20

13. "Food for the stomach and the stomach for food"--but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.
14. By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also.
15. Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never!
16. Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, "The two will become one flesh."
17. But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with him in spirit.
18. Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.
19. Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20. you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.

Seems like the "Sexually Inclusive Church" wants to turn the Apostle Paul's work a 180 degrees and make the "Church" back into the former "Corinth" instead of turning the of Corinthians into a "Church."

67 posted on 08/30/2003 6:58:26 PM PDT by KriegerGeist ("The weapons of our warefare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Kolodny, an author and former national coordinator for The National Bisexual Network, was leading a workshop called “Blessed Bi Spirit: Bisexual People of Faith.” Although focusing mostly on bisexuality, Kolodny, who is Jewish, explained that she could not conclude the session without discussing polyamory.
_______________

Ok, let's forget for a moment about all of the passages that deal with sexual promiscuity and unnatural sexual behaviors. Do homosexuals believe in idols? Did they ever consider that the fact that they are so focused on their sexuality is perhaps making an idol out of it?

I am so sick of these people, I really am. There seems to be no boundary to the kind of sexual deviancies they are willing to endorse. What is next--a one-night stand is holy and monogamous at least for a few hours? Perhaps a rape is holy in some way? How about child molestation? Sick bastards! What's even more mind boggling is the fact that anyone who does not engage in these activities and calls themselves Christian would agree to it.
78 posted on 08/30/2003 7:17:13 PM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
There is significant evidence that many early Christian groups had rather questionable sexual practices.
86 posted on 08/30/2003 7:27:10 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (TOM McCLINTOCK is my choice for governor. He should be yours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
It was just a matter of time.

It's moving real fast, isn't it? Lost, lost, lost.

93 posted on 08/30/2003 7:38:43 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
"Perry said he “just got married” to his male partner of 18 years, who has had AIDS for several years."

Ok where did he get AIDS from if he was in an 18 year relationship?? oh nevermind...

99 posted on 08/30/2003 7:44:49 PM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
They'll have to start a new religion. Christianity is already 100% anti-homosexuality and will never change.
102 posted on 08/30/2003 7:46:41 PM PDT by unspun ("Do everything in love." | No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; scripter; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ...
Bump and ping

Scripter will be off line occasionally between now and the middle of September. I've agreed to help him out by running his homosexual agenda ping list.

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links
Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe to or unsubscribe from scripter's homosexual agenda ping list. If you wish to be added to the list in scripter's absence, please FReepmail me.

108 posted on 08/30/2003 7:54:37 PM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
What about the poor quadro-sexuals? I mean, don't these good church goers care about the feelings of those that love men, women, animals, plants and their Vita-Mix? Oh, the crosses some must bear...
112 posted on 08/30/2003 8:01:20 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Defund NPR, PBS and the LSC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
"The Rev. Troy Perry, founder of the predominantly homosexual Metropolitan Community Churches..."


Sex, torture and erotic electrification in America's 'gay' churches - The Metropolitan Community Church

113 posted on 08/30/2003 8:01:57 PM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
She argued that having multiple sexual partners can be “holy.”

Sure. And why wouldn't she so argue? If people can pretend to embrace homosexuality and remain Christian, what behavior can they NOT accept? The greatest sin is to be "judgmental," don't you know?

131 posted on 08/30/2003 8:27:32 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
I knew it! I knew it! I knew it! Just the other day I predicted in a thread that the bisexuals would be encouraged by the gay "marriage" issue to demand polygamy. I predicted that the bisexuals would demand "marriages" of foursomes since everyone swung both ways. I was wrong in that I predicted that bisexual polygamous "marriage" would take a few years to become an issue. I'm afraid the pedophiles will be the next champions of "diversity," once the gays and bi's get most of what they want.

Next, I again predict that Muslim men will argue that it is "discrimination" if they cannot have many wives. The liberals will be backed into a corner and will accept all sorts of reactionary, backwards things since they think all standards are relative.

Eventually, there won't be much of America worth saving and we might as well let the Chicoms nuke us and start over.

137 posted on 08/30/2003 8:40:36 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (Lurking since 1997!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
“We have all learned to challenge Romans,” said the Rev. Mari Castellanos, referring to St. Paul’s letter that, among other Scriptures, is critical of homosexual behavior. Castellanos leads the Justice and Witness Ministries of the United Church of Christ. “We must do likewise with all texts that go against our brothers and sisters that are being claimed as the unerring Word of God.”

Then, Mari ( I will not address her as reverent of anything except of her own fleshly desires ), you have decided to war against God and I assure you that He will be the victor.

This article is a sickening example of what happens when morality is booted out of a nation. It is also a visual of what Sodom must have been like when God decided to destroy it.

138 posted on 08/30/2003 8:41:31 PM PDT by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
A ludicrous fringe group.
144 posted on 08/30/2003 8:47:48 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
It was just a matter of time.

Agreed. But it didn't start with homosexuality. It started when we loosened our morals and accepted lust, fornication, cohabitation, pornogratphy, adultery, etc.

All of the above are in direct contrast to what the Bible teaches. The best way to eliminate homosexuality from society is to stick with the ban on ALL immoral behaviours. When you allow one, you open the door to the rest. When will it all (or the society that condones it) end? It's only a matter of time.

146 posted on 08/30/2003 9:02:11 PM PDT by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
“I disagree with the queer movement [when it claims] that sexual orientation is predetermined,” Kolodny said, asserting that the existence of bisexuality “challenges all that.”

“I know a lot of women who chose to become lesbian,” Kolodny said.

“I’m not sure we can make the case for genetic predetermination,” Kolodny stressed...

Kolodny lamented that the “queer” movement insists on the “party line” of genetic predetermination as part of a “political strategy.”

“The queer movement relies on, ‘We can’t help it. We’re born this way,’ Kolodny said. “It feels so safe. If you don’t say it you’re thrown to the lions and you’re evil.”

She charged that denying free choice in sex preference was “perpetuating the hetero-patriarchy,” helping the “radical right,” ignoring bisexuality, and making it easier for “hate” to continue.

I felt that these statements bore repeating. They are very revealing. More and more homo-activists are admitting that homosexuality (or in this case, anything goes) is a choice.

I wish that Christians who adhere to Biblical principles would be more vocal about the kind of sick degeneracy and subversion described in the above article. Maybe giving up allegiance to "their" sect when it abandons God's teachings, and going to a church that hasn't gone over to the dark side.

149 posted on 08/30/2003 10:02:48 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Liberal Christians? The ultimate oxymoron.
158 posted on 08/31/2003 3:41:52 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
This really should have had a "barf alert" on it.

Carolyn

160 posted on 08/31/2003 4:04:21 AM PDT by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Going to Hell in a Handbasket--Ping.
161 posted on 08/31/2003 4:37:08 AM PDT by Paul Ross (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!-A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
One day when we're all old we'll sit around and talk about how Rich Santorum warned us. ....
168 posted on 08/31/2003 7:20:27 AM PDT by thathamiltonwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson