Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose
I don't know. Is this suppposed to help Arnold, or not? Seems pretty ambiguous....

And in California, that is taken to be a virtue in some quarters.
5 posted on 08/30/2003 3:28:43 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel
This article has been pretty comprehensively and convincingly rebutted -- by most of the people it actually names.

Having said that, we are talking about Arnold and Hollywood, so I am sure that he has not been a pious milquetoast all these years. His article in "Oui", which I remember reading when it came out, proves that much at least.
6 posted on 08/30/2003 3:43:51 PM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: alloysteel
The steroid thing is interesting. It is of course unrealistic to expect Arnold to attain the level of muscle mass (and more importantly body fat percentage) without a significant amount of steroids. Nevertheless, it is clear that Arnold did not (and does not) use the dosages and variety of today's bodybuilders. Arnold looked great; modern bodybuilders look like freaks. Many of them will not even live to Arnold's current age.
7 posted on 08/30/2003 3:45:23 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson