To: ambrose
I don't know. Is this suppposed to help Arnold, or not? Seems pretty ambiguous....
And in California, that is taken to be a virtue in some quarters.
To: alloysteel
This article has been pretty comprehensively and convincingly rebutted -- by most of the people it actually names.
Having said that, we are talking about Arnold and Hollywood, so I am sure that he has not been a pious milquetoast all these years. His article in "Oui", which I remember reading when it came out, proves that much at least.
6 posted on
08/30/2003 3:43:51 PM PDT by
Ronin
(Qui tacet consentit!)
To: alloysteel
The steroid thing is interesting. It is of course unrealistic to expect Arnold to attain the level of muscle mass (and more importantly body fat percentage) without a significant amount of steroids. Nevertheless, it is clear that Arnold did not (and does not) use the dosages and variety of today's bodybuilders. Arnold looked great; modern bodybuilders look like freaks. Many of them will not even live to Arnold's current age.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson