[Cicero]

You wouldn't need sources if you read some of the articles posted here at the time, NOT from the mainstream press. The Indian power plant was an egregious example of bribery and corruption, especially since it was just coming unraveled when the Enron scandal broke--or rather was orchestrated by the press with the obvious intention of duplicating Watergate.

[Friend of thunder]

You wouldn't need sources if you read some of the articles posted here at the time,

I am no defender of Clinton, and I realize that if there were any political shenanigans regarding Enron the vast majority would have had to taken place during that administration if only because Clinton was in power for so much more of Enron’s history than Bush was. However, when specific allegations are made – irrespective of whether I want to believe them or not – it is only prudent to attempt to verify them.

I could allege that Clinton did it with a goat (I am not so alleging) with out some type of proof it would be so much chatter. Please understand, I am in no way questioning Anyokie’s credibility or honesty my concern is that information used to defend Bush or condemn Clinton is accurate; otherwise we – conservatives – appear foolish. If it is accurate, I want to be able to cite the source.