Replies

Maybe, but how about this...The Bible is a product of two milleniums of painstaking research done by many who have devoted their lives to it.

Irrelevant, I was referring to scientific research. My point about the 150 years was to show how untrue the statement made by the pastor was.

Or this...FILL IN THE BLANK WITH NAME OF YOUR FAVORITE EVOLUTIONIST is your typical, ignorant Liar for Darwin. (not implying that all Evolutionists are this way)

His statement was such an outlandish and easily-refutable distortion that it is fitting to call him a liar.

That is ALL they care about though, is their bible, and they will use it to bash science in any way shape or form they can.

If it cannot use the bible, it is irrelavant, it had BETTER use the bible or it's the devils work.

Shoot, one creationist already told me that if God came down from on high and told her that their bible was not meant to be taken literally, she would NOT believe that it was god telling her and would continue to take it literally.

What can you say against such mindsets?

Science is science, religion is religion, there is a difference, and they want to try and convince people that there isn't. Science is not religion, it CANNOT use god as a causation, creationism is NOT science, it is religion, and SHOULD NOT be taught in a science class.

When science uses god as a causation, then it becomes religion, ID being a PRIME example of such silliness.