Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.Korea Against More Talks, Wants More Atomic Arms
Reuters ^ | 08-30-03

Posted on 08/30/2003 8:19:18 AM PDT by Brian S

Sat August 30, 2003 07:20 AM ET By Martin Nesirky

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea said on Saturday the hardline U.S. stance at the Beijing nuclear negotiations meant there was no point in holding further talks and left it with no choice but to enhance its nuclear deterrent force.

China -- North Korea's closest ally and organizer of last week's six-way talks -- sought to keep the momentum for dialogue going.

A North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman told the North's KCNA news agency Washington had adopted a harder line at the talks and had demanded Pyongyang "drop its gun first."

"How can the DPRK trust the U.S. and drop its gun?" the spokesman said, using the initial letters of the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. "Even a child would not be taken in by such a trick."

China, which used unprecedented diplomatic leverage to arrange the meeting, said it hoped the talks aimed at defusing the nuclear crisis would continue, as agreed on Friday. It also repeated its opposition to nuclear weapons on the divided Korean peninsula, but stopped short of condemning the North's comments.

"We hope all parties will continue to make efforts and continue the process of dialogue," the Chinese Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

But the North Korean spokesman said the Beijing talks -- also attended by China, Japan, Russia and South Korea -- were a trick aimed at disarming the isolated communist state.

The U.S. delegation had hardened its stance by saying it would negotiate fully with North Korea only once the North had scrapped its nuclear development program, he said.

"This means the U.S. asking the DPRK to drop its gun first, saying it would not open fire, when both sides are leveling guns at each other," it said.

It said the talks had been reduced to an "armchair argument" that convinced the North Washington did not intend to change.

"This made it impossible for the DPRK to have any interest or expectation for the talks as they are not beneficial to it," the spokesman said in KCNA's English-language version.

The earlier Korean-language text said: "We are not interested at all in this kind of talks."

KELLY SEES GLASS HALF FULL

It was not clear whether the spokesman's comments signaled a formal change in policy from Friday's agreement to talk again or was part of Pyongyang's rhetorical repertoire. The English-language version was ambiguous enough to refer to this week's talks rather than future meetings.

Earlier, an unidentified North Korean delegate to the talks made similar remarks to reporters at Beijing airport. He said he saw no need for further discussions.

But analysts dismissed the delegate's comments as posturing by the North, which typically steps up its rhetoric or makes conflicting statements to try to confuse its opponents or win concessions. The same could be true of the ministry remarks.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman's comments on increasing North Korea's nuclear deterrent force were somewhat clearer, but did not state directly that the North already has nuclear weapons, as the United States suspects.

A commentary in the official newspaper Minju Joson said every country had a right to defend itself and went further than the ministry by saying the North already had a nuclear force.

"The DPRK's nuclear deterrent force is a means for self-defense which it was compelled to build to cope with the situation in which the sovereignty of the country was seriously infringed upon due to the evermore undisguised U.S. moves to stifle it with nukes," the newspaper said.

Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly, the head of the U.S. delegation, told reporters the talks had been productive but there was a long way to go before the crisis was defused.

It began last October when Kelly confronted the North with evidence of its secret nuclear program. Washington said the North confirmed it had the covert project.

The crisis deepened after the isolated North threw out U.N. inspectors, pulled out of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and took its Yongbyon nuclear plant out of mothballs.

Pyongyang has frequently used bluster when discussing its nuclear capabilities. U.S. officials have said North Korea raised the rhetoric on Thursday by talking about carrying out a test and saying it could declare itself a nuclear power.

"The contradiction is a maneuver and consistent with North Korea's pattern of behavior in the past," said Shi Yinhong, an international relations expert at Beijing's People's University.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: beijingsummit; iaea; northkorea; nukes

1 posted on 08/30/2003 8:19:19 AM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian S
No mention here, I see, of why the US takes such a "hard line". The last time the US agreed with the North Koreans based on their future good behavior, they were violating the agreement (negotiated by that milquetoast Jimmy Carter) before the ink was dry.

We're the ones who ought to be using a well-known children's saying - "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me."

Of course, I shouldn't be surprised none of this appears. The article was by Reuters, after all.
2 posted on 08/30/2003 8:26:07 AM PDT by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
"How can the DPRK trust the U.S. and drop its gun?" the spokesman said

When it's dead.

Dead people don't hold guns.

3 posted on 08/30/2003 8:26:56 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
The North Koreans don't seem to understand the meaning of us pulling our troops further back from the DMZ. They must think we're afraid to fight when the reality is that we're just expecting "bigger booms".
4 posted on 08/30/2003 8:48:02 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
In North Korea's view of the US there has been no change in the ruling class and therefore they will follow the playbook that worked for them unitl now.

Look for that nuclear test to happen within a forenight and they will sit back and anticipate our cave-in then. Only this time they may not like what they get.

5 posted on 08/30/2003 8:50:58 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
All tyrannies become incestuous, the leaders isolated from the outside world and talking only among themselves. The lose the ability to deal successfully with the outside world. As their internal problems increase, as they always do, they become more belligerent and harder to deal with. The only thing that changes that is if they are contained long enough they will implode, or they must be destroyed.

Containing NK has been easy enough until they started trading in WMD. That can't be allowed to continue so containment seems a risky option. Interesting times ahead.
6 posted on 08/30/2003 9:12:46 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Negotiating with the North Koreans has never been worth it- we should have gone North in the 1960's and crushed that miserable Stalinist regime, when the South Koreans still had the guts to fight. Now the South is rich and spoiled, and any action WE take on behalf of our own security and that of our allies (especially Japan) will be seen as more unilateral, "cowboy", American bullying.

I spent a LOT of time there, know a lot about the people and the situation, and I see no answer short of war. Hope I'm wrong.

But I have a strange belief that the President means what he says- and Iran and NK are on their last chance to grow up and learn not to threaten a nation (which has, by the way, 30,000 nuclear weapons and very efficient delivery systems) with their ability to take out an American city or two.

7 posted on 08/30/2003 9:22:44 AM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE (<i>"Audaces Fortuna Juvat"</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
I spent a LOT of time there, know a lot about the people and the situation, and I see no answer short of war. Hope I'm wrong.

Well, I hope you are wrong too, but I do not see any answer to this either.

8 posted on 08/30/2003 11:13:02 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
The world may indeed see the efficiency of our delivery systems - but not our newest ones on foes such as NK.
9 posted on 08/30/2003 11:34:42 AM PDT by 11B3 (Looking for a belt-fed, multi-barreled 12 guage. It's Liberal season, no daily limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
The Foreign Ministry spokesman's comments on increasing North Korea's nuclear deterrent force were somewhat clearer: "Tricksey capitalistes try to take our precious!"
10 posted on 08/30/2003 11:40:21 AM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson