Too bad for your case that your realm of "evidence" willfully excludes counterevidence that contradicts your original claim. By that I am refering to the 10 full length books he has written, of which only one pertains to Lincoln.
which you hilariously mislabeled as ad hominem
There is no vice in calling something what it is, and as I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt by way of definition, your original post was a poorly constructed ad hominem. I'm truly sorry if you don't like being called on your fallacies but in that you have only yourself to blame. If you desire to avoid it in the future, don't shoot your mouth off.
Actually there is only one book listed on Amazon with DiLorenzo as the author, and it is about.................you guessed it! Lincoln!
He is listed as a coauthor with some other guy on a couple of books. One of them claims smoking is good for society. LOL! And I'll bet good Union money he works Lincoln into the sections of the book he worked on! Until you look at it, you can't say they don't deal with Lincoln. With our obsessed DiLorenzo, safe bet to say they do! So where's your so called counter evidence? Nowhere! Now scram.