Curious. Instead of adding to the string of anti-Rockwell ad hominems you at least took the time to notice that it was written by Tom DiLorenzo...before launching into a string of anti-Dilorenzo ad hominems. It puts you ahead of your colleagues by a few feet though you are still behind any substantive discussion by several miles.
String of ad hominems? Come now. The closest thing to an ad hominem is my claim that Mr. DiLorenzo is trying to make a career out of Lincoln bashing. I said Lincoln is DiLorenzo's single-minded obsession. I don't actually think either of those statements qualifies as ad hominem. And even if they do, they are hardly a string. So back off on that one. You're completely wrong. Totally off base. Whining up the wrong tree. And by the way, can DiLorenzo go two paragraphs without mentioning Lincoln? I don't think he could write a recipe for cornbread without mentioning old Ape Lincom.
As for substantive discussion, I said very plainly in my post that I don't see any point in it, and I gave my reason why. It's pointless. Get it?
As for Rockwell, anyone with any sense knows he's scum. Now THAT'S ad hominem. It's also right on the money. Good day.