[tuesday afternoon]

Bill O'Reilly did a segment on this last night. The mother said she "did not make an issue of her lifestyle." She assumed they inferred it from the child's birth certificate. The child is adopted and the "moms" are listed as the parents. Also, she is a member of the parish where the school is.

It was a very short segment which left much unanswered. O'Reilly apparently also interviewed her on his radio show. Anyone catch it?

[OpusatFR]

I didn't see or hear it. I waded through her blog which tells me she has some very serious issues. She is an activist that is fairly obvious.

Have you read a few of her entries. She has been following this on Free Republic and posting comments made by Freepers on the threads.

I'm pretty sure her goal is to challenge the Church's authority.

[OpusatFR]

Sorry. Been reading another blog by someone of the same name posted as the person this brouhaha is all about. Not the same though the activism is still left of left.

The blog domain belongs to some lefty with a skewed view on the world of men. No wonder it was mistaken as ~the~ one.

In any event, my view hasn't changed.

[Jorge]

Bill O'Reilly did a segment on this last night. The mother said she "did not make an issue of her lifestyle." She assumed they inferred it from the child's birth certificate. The child is adopted and the "moms" are listed as the parents. Also, she is a member of the parish where the school is.

I saw it.

Now we see that all these accusations that she is a lesbian activist using her daughter to attack the Catholic Church and to push a gay agenda...are all completely out of line.

No surprise that the same people who were pushing this fictional nonsense were also throwing wild and hysterical accusations at me for defending the little girl.
Truly sad.