[Jorge]

Look ma! Another anti-Catholic transparently using this as an excuse to take yet another shot at the Church!

Look ma! Another poster who would rather make baseless accusations than actually address the position of poster he disagrees with!

You can't show me anything "anti-Catholic" about my posts.
For all you know I am a Catholic.

I disagree with the decision made by the administrator of this particular Catholic school.
Are you saying this decision in fact represents the policy of then entire Catholic Church? That the Church rejects any kids who's parents lifestyly happens to include sin? Incredible.

For one who pressumes to be defending the Catholic Church, funny you've been unable to offer a single argument supporting their position.

[OpusatFR]

The child begins instruction at six. At seven she makes her first confession and receives Communion.

Do you ask her, at that age, to assess her mother's and her companion's relationship in juxtaposition to the Church's teachings? And at seven, the child has seen them react to each other as lovers.

How does this child reconcile the teachings against impurity with what she witnesses? How does the mother explain to the child that she does not believe that Church is the arbiter of morality and is wrong in its teachings about purity and fornication? Then, how does the mother continue to send the child to instruction that conflicts with Church teaching.

The child needs to go to a public school. The mother needs to stop using her child as a political pawn. That in itself is a grave issue. Her website is quite enlightening.

[GirlShortstop]

You can't show me anything "anti-Catholic" about my posts.

You Jorge are first and foremost pro-homosexual.   You remain so regardless of TRUTH presenting itself; "I'll call you names!" is your m.o. in support of the agenda.   You were asked to clarify and substantiate your position in this matter (the lesbians are right, the Catholics are wrong), and time, and time again, (you can or can not read the question?) you danced.  By choosing such a tact, you are blowing smoke, and have revealed your Anti-Catholic sentiments.  That's basic; it is a common sense deduction from which you can not slither away.

For all you know I am a Catholic.

Are you too cowardly to state your faith?  Guess you're about as Catholic as Luther.

Jorge says:  I disagree with the decision made by the administrator of this particular Catholic school.    AKA:

The idea that these kids should be banned like poison from school because some holy roller hypocrites want to punish them for their parent's shortcomings is mean spirited, short sighted and a poor Christian testimony.

Laughibly, that was supposed to be a response to my question at post 88:       Perhaps if you'd like to "side with" the lesbians, you can offer a reason why these two would *want* to foist a Catholic education on the child?  <snip>

Read on Jorge, there is much more that has escaped you:

post 145 by TheCrusader:
The Catholic Church teaches that homosexual acts are unnatural, sinful and evil, so a Catholic school is not a suitable place for the "daughter" of two avowed homosexual perverts to get her education. One must ask the question of why these two lesbians would want to bring their daughter to a school that they know will teach the child that her parents are "intrinsicly disordered", (sinful and perverted)? Don't they care about this girl's feelings? The whole thing stinks of a setup, with the poor little girl being used as the human bait. This reveals just how evil these two lesbian perverts are.

post 147 by ninenot:
Those women are using that little girl like they would use a Kleenex--or a refrigerator. The poor little kid is a possession, a means to some ends for them.

post 149 by saradippity:
Since so many people believe truth is relative,including most members of the "progressive" community to which active homosexuals belong,it is only prudent and charitable to deny admission to the children of persons who hold in contempt Church teaching on faith and morals.  To immerse a young child,on a daily basis,to a culture that is contrary to the culture the child's family espouses is cruel and dangerous. In fact,it is bound to create great confusion,and we all know who uses that tool quite adroitly, don't we?

post 153 by OpusatFR:

"I think we have become so (cruel) in the attempt to reduce all virtues to kindness. For Plato rightly taught that the virtue is one. You cannot be kind unless you have all the other virtues. If, being cowardly, conceited, slothful, you have never yet done a fellow creature great mischief, that is only because your neighbour's welfare has not yet happened to conflict with your safety, self-approval, or ease.
Every vice leads to cruelty. Even a good emotion, pity, if not controlled by charity and justice, leads through anger to cruelty."     C.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain