To: AAABEST
Two lower courts have dismissed the cases, ruling that they did not effectively argue that Clinton misused the Antiquities Act, and even if he did, the statute does not allow for judicial recourse. The White House pointed to these rulings as reason enough for the High Court to keep them off its docket. "Even if petitioners had timely pleaded a claim that the president abused his discretion in applying the Antiquities Act standards to the designations at issue here, petitioners would not be entitled to judicial review of that contention,
These are the points I believe are important. The Solicitor Generals office is protecting Presidential Power.
They do not want a precedent set that would limit Presidential Power.
15 posted on
08/30/2003 7:28:00 AM PDT by
Pontiac
To: Pontiac
If true, Bush shouldn't have made promises he knew he wouldn't be able to keep.
17 posted on
08/30/2003 7:31:30 AM PDT by
KantianBurke
(The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
To: Pontiac
Clinton ordered this with the stroke of a pen.
If Bush was interested he could undo them with the stroke of a pen.
His consistent defense of Clinton's actions says more than all the howling of his defenders.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson