"That's a real good idea. Vote for the trash candidate -- hashish smoker, orgy participant. BUT AT LEAST YOU'RE IN POWER. THE ARNOLD SUPPORTERS ON THIS WEBSITE LIKE YOU TRULY MAKE ME ILL.
The Founders of this nation ALWAYS believed that the people elected to power would be the most moral, the most righteousness, the most honorable among us."
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
First let me say..I'm no longer a Calif resident..and I'm very suspicious of SchwarzenKennedy..And at this point in time wouldn't vote for him...even if I could.
But.....I've certainly done things in my past...that I'm not proud of. Isn't it more important that someone prove themselves to be changed...and possibly better for their experiences..than for some to forever hold that against them?
I agree the premise SHOULD be to elect the leaders amongst us. Those who can show "us" the errors of our ways...Those among "us" who are up-standing citizens, and strive to always be the best people they can be....moral, honest, hard-working, humble, strong of conviction type people. But are these people expected to be pure as the wind driven snow? Are these people expected to have zero historical blemishes?
Sure...I agree, the past can be a window on a person's character, or lack thereof. But like steel being tempered....some come thru the "fire" of a intemperate time...better & stronger for it.
fwiw-