Posted on 08/30/2003 5:19:26 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
|
At Least Two Killed As Russian Sub Sinks
By DEBORAH SEWARD, Associated Press Writer MOSCOW - A Russian nuclear-powered submarine sank in the Barents Sea on Saturday morning as it was being towed to a scrapyard, killing at least two of the 10 sailors on board, the Defense Ministry said.
The two nuclear reactors of the 40-year-old K-159 was shut down at the time of the sinking at about 4 a.m. about 3 1/2 miles northwest of Kildin Island, the ministry said. No weapons were aboard.
Rescue ships of the Northern Fleet reached the accident site within an hour in heavy rain. One sailor was rescued, the bodies of two dead crew members were found and the fate of seven others were unknown, the ministry said.
The water in the Barents Sea was about 50 degrees Fahrenheit where the K-159 sank, meaning a person could survive about 45 minutes without protective gear, Navy spokesman Capt. Igor Dygalo told the ITAR-Tass news agency.
The chance of finding more survivors was low, Adm. Viktor Kravchenko, deputy chief of the navy, was quoted as saying by NTV television.
The K-159, a November-class attack submarine, was decommissioned on July 16, 1989. It was being towed on four pontoons from its base in the town of Gremikha to a plant in Polarnye where workers were to unload the nuclear fuel and scrap the vessel.
The pontoons were torn off by the fierce storm, and the submarine sank in 560 feet of water, the ministry said.
The sub posed no environmental risk, Dygalo said.
The Kremlin press service said that Russian President Vladimir Putin (news - web sites), who was in Sardinia for meetings with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, had been informed of the sinking. However, there was no immediate reaction from the Russian leader.
Russia's last major submarine accident was the sinking of the Kursk (news - web sites) on Aug. 12, 2000, while on maneuvers in the Barents Sea. All 118 men on board were killed, and the tragedy shed light on the troubles of the Russian navy in the post-Soviet era.
Russia has decommissioned about 189 nuclear-powered submarines over the past 15 years. However, officials say 126 of those are still are at docks with nuclear fuel in their reactors, prompting international concern about leaks and the possibility of nuclear materials being transferred to other nations or terrorists.
It will cost $3.9 billion to scrap all the subs, Russian officials say. Yet last year, the Russian government budgeted just $70 million for improving nuclear safety in the country as a whole.
Submarines of the November class, the first generation of Russian nuclear subs, entered service between 1958-1963, according to Jane's Fighting Ships. They carried 104 crew members, and the K-159 was designed to carry low-yield nuclear torpedoes.
A submarine of the same type, the K-8, caught fire and sank in April 1970 in the Bay of Biscay north of Spain while returning from naval maneuvers, killing 52 people. |
Assuming they can start the engine...
Yes. And the Iranians have two of them. Either Russian or Indian. I forget.
Possible, but highly unlikely.
If the Ruskies can barely sail these things without sinking them, it may be a good idea to sell the entire lot (or just give them away) to the Jihad sailors (haha).
Load the boats up with as many martyrs as possible.
Loved it when he said about Daniel Ortega:
'The little dictator who went to Moscow for a bear hug!'
What wit! :~)
Thanks! :~)
I've just GOT to see them dive in the sand!! :~)

USS Pampanito!
The craftsmanship inside this sub is unbelievable, compared to the 'crapmanship' inside the Cobra!

The pontoons were torn off by the fierce storm, and the submarine sank in 560 feet of water, the ministry said.
Submarines are designed to have neutral buoyancy. That is that they will if left alone be just as likely sink as float.
Submarines in order to be sea worthy must have propulsion power. They must be able to move in order to stay afloat or change depth. Submarines have ballast tanks, which they can either fill with air or water to add or remove buoyancy but in rough seas totally emptying all the ballast tanks would not keep a sub afloat. Also without power to run air compressors blowing the ballast tanks would not be possible.
What I find most curious is that they found it necessary to have the sub manned at all while under tow.
A sub on the surface has little lateral stability. Meaning it is easily rocked from side to side. Eventually the sub would have rolled on its side exposing its ballast tank vents, which on the bottom of the submarine have no valves to prevent air from escaping and water from entering.
The ballast tanks on a sub work like a upside down water glass forced down in a bucket of water. As long as the glasss mouth is maintained down the water can not enter.
Once the submarine lost its pontoon and was rolled on its side its ballast tanks would have filled with water and it would become negatively buoyant.
Once the sub lost its pontoons in rough seas it was doomed to sink hatches open or not.
I can see one or two men to maintain the towline. On the other hand being that the sub is a warship with a fueled reactor and most likely classified equipment on board it is probably required by their naval regulations to be manned at all times outside of a Russian naval staion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.