Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH
It "covered" the recall election by covering only Arnold and Bustamante, and only Arnold's platform was described. Why not Bustamante's, as well as McClintock's?

It could well be because they have already covered Bustamante's and McClintock's platforms. News is just that, its news. If McClintock hasnt said or done something new, why would they report it. The news media is not a propaganda forum for politicians. You actually have to generate NEWS to get news coverage. As the EXPERIENCED and COMPETENT politician, McClintock ought to know that.

75 posted on 08/30/2003 8:24:26 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Dave S
It could well be because they have already covered Bustamante's and McClintock's platforms. News is just that, its news. If McClintock hasnt said or done something new, why would they report it. The news media is not a propaganda forum for politicians. You actually have to generate NEWS to get news coverage. As the EXPERIENCED and COMPETENT politician, McClintock ought to know that.

I am not sure what your point is. Much of Arnold's recent positioning is an echo of positions he has taken in the past. McClintock doubled his support in the last week; that's not news?

87 posted on 08/30/2003 10:28:58 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson