Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: risk
http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/dockets.cfm?dist=3&doc_id=44791

This link will take you to the Court of Appeal website, which reads:


The petition for writ of mandamus
is denied. We will assume, without deciding, that
Petitioner was authorized by Government Code
section 85401, subdivision (a), to file an
amended "statement of intention." Nevertheless,
the record is inadequate to provide Petitioner
with the requested relief. Among other things,
Petitioner has failed to present evidence that
he tried to file, or was in a position to file,
a signed and dated amended statement of intention
in a timely manner, i.e., on or before 08/29/03
at 5:00 p.m. At best, the record contains an
unsigned and undated amended statement of
intention, in violation of Government Code
section 85200. Blease, Acting P.J. (H K)
104 posted on 08/30/2003 12:50:34 PM PDT by ambrose (If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ambrose
on or before 08/29/03 at 5:00 p.m.

So let's wait and see.. the court apparently held (in dicta) that McClintock had until 5pm on Friday to file the amended form. Did he? This article does not say.

105 posted on 08/30/2003 12:54:00 PM PDT by ambrose (If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson