To: AppyPappy
Then you need to read more slowly, I set out several distinctions, and you ignored most.
And there aren't just two positions: supporting private ownership of guns, and supporting gun control. And I know you know that.
And Sch OPPOSES raising taxes. As you can read today, he has turned to the conservative, pro-tax-cut Hoover Institute for advisors, and for the coming audit.
It is disingenuous to ignore facts uncongenial to your pre-decided position, then call those who disagree with you "stupid."
Dan
101 posted on
08/30/2003 12:34:14 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
A vote for
RINOLD is a move too far to the left to be considered pragmatic.
GOOOOOOO, McClintock!
102 posted on
08/30/2003 12:43:04 PM PDT by
tame
(If I must be the victim of a criminal, please let it be Catwoman! Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!)
To: BibChr
Read on in the article and you can see that McClintock faxed the amendment. He did not take it there personally. What idiot relies on faxing a document as important at this. It should have been hand carried and whoever in the office recieved it should have been made to sign for it.
This is really sloppy by McClintock. Very, very sloppy.
And to say this is a first amendment issue, that is the same kind of court twisting I am getting very sick of. This is not a first amendment issue. This is an issue about the proper filing of paperwork. He did not do it.
My impression of McClintock is now much lower than it was previously. He was my ideal choice for governor. Not after this behaviour though.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson