Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea says no need for further talks on nuclear issue
Associated Press ^ | SANG-HUN CHOE

Posted on 08/29/2003 10:52:21 PM PDT by witnesstothefall

BEIJING, Aug 30, 2003 (AP WorldStream via COMTEX) -- North Korea no longer has "interest or expectations" in further talks on its nuclear program, a spokesman for Pyongyang's delegation to six-nation talks on the subject said Saturday.

"There is no need for this kind of talks," the unidentified spokesman told reporters at Beijing's airport, reading from a statement as the delegation was leaving the Chinese capital after the landmark three-day meeting.

"This round of talks was nothing more than empty talks," the spokesman said. "We no longer have interest or expectations either for this kind of talks."

The United States, North Korea, China, Japan, South Korea and Russia had gathered for three days of discussions in an effort to ease tensions that have been building since Pyongyang acknowledged in October that it restarted a nuclear program it had supposedly shut down.

The United States has demanded that the program be stopped immediately, but North Korea has refused to comply unless it receives economic aid and a nonaggression treaty from the United States.

"This is not just a difference in opinion but a difference in fundamental policies," the North Korean spokesman said. "We have come to conclude that the United States has no intention for a policy switchover and it plots to disarm our country through sinister schemes."

Brinkmanship and bluster have characterized North Korea's diplomacy in recent years. During the six-nation talks, North Korea said it would prove to the world it possesses nuclear weapons by testing a nuclear device, according to a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

But Pyongyang's chief delegate, Vice Foreign Minister Kim Yong Il, also suggested his country was willing to abandon the nuclear weapons program if the United States agreed to its conditions.

"It is not our goal to have nuclear weapons," Pyongyang's state-run news agency, KCNA, quoted Kim as saying.

The talks ended Friday with the goal of holding another round of talks in the near future, but no date was immediately set.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: beijingsummit; northkorea; nukes; peninsularmushrooms; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Tick tock says the clock. It was folly to break bread with these people at all. But necessary all the same.
1 posted on 08/29/2003 10:52:21 PM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
I agree. This conversation can continue with ammunition.
2 posted on 08/29/2003 10:54:57 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Welcome to the Iraq Roach Motel - Islamofascists check in, but they don't check out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Cool tagline, and I hate taglines. lol
3 posted on 08/29/2003 11:03:57 PM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
May be we ought to burn out their stomachs, huh?
4 posted on 08/29/2003 11:11:01 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
May be we ought to burn out their stomachs, huh?

Probably better to burn out their eyes.

5 posted on 08/29/2003 11:12:54 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
Terrorist blackmail.

Don't blink, Mr Bush.

You're being assayed.

Strike early and hard.

The talks are over.

6 posted on 08/29/2003 11:18:11 PM PDT by dasboot (Celebrate UNITY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
I don't think North Korea realizes the implications here. If something is not fixed here...Japan will rearm and become a nuclear power over the next 10 years (and yes, the US will readily help them do so). This will in turn force South Korea to fully arm, and develop nuclear weapons as well. Its almost like the North Koreans are bent on suicide eventually. They have lived in such a vacuum...that they can't even think straight. One has to wonder what China sees in this whole episode. A glowing nuclear hot North Korea has no advantage for China to use. It would seem that its time to fire off a cruise missiles at these development centers and just see what happens next.
7 posted on 08/29/2003 11:20:45 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
Strike early and hard. (that way, you won't have to strike at all: China ain't stoopid)
8 posted on 08/29/2003 11:21:05 PM PDT by dasboot (Celebrate UNITY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
You ready for thousands of dead Americans in the first 48 hours?
9 posted on 08/30/2003 12:28:25 AM PDT by Finalapproach29er ("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
Are you ready for MILLIONS of dead Americans within 2 years?
10 posted on 08/30/2003 1:23:27 AM PDT by PokeyJoe (Don't talk about my armchair unless you know how to pull the recliner lever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe; TigerLikesRooster; FreepForever; wretchard; AmericanInTokyo
Are you ready for MILLIONS of dead Americans within 2 years?

"Talks may have failed" bump, lock and load.

11 posted on 08/30/2003 1:31:29 AM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er; PokeyJoe
You ready for thousands of dead Americans in the first 48 hours?


Simple solution. Nuke, nuke, and nuke some more. If you nuke the entire country at once then there's no one to launch missiles with bombs, if those bombs survive. Lets face it, it's not the best solution but if there's a war, and it's looking more and more likely, and North Korea has nukes, they'll use em. So it's simply a matter of do we strike first and save American lives, South Korean lives and possibly Japanese lives, or wait until were the victims?
12 posted on 08/30/2003 2:15:11 AM PDT by bitcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
Less talk, more action alert.
13 posted on 08/30/2003 2:29:44 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
Fine NKorea, bye.

...and here are the instructions on how to grow rice and wheat and potatos.......rotsa ruck.

no food for you
14 posted on 08/30/2003 2:38:15 AM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
What's your plan?
15 posted on 08/30/2003 2:56:27 AM PDT by dasboot (Celebrate UNITY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
N. Korea Rejects Additional Nuclear Talks 52 minutes ago

By AUDRA ANG, Associated Press Writer

BEIJING - North Korea (news - web sites) angrily dismissed the possibility of further negotiations over its nuclear program on Saturday, one day after the end of landmark six-nation talks where the isolated regime indicated it might be willing to reach a compromise.
"This round of talks was nothing more than empty talks," an unidentified North Korean delegation spokesman told reporters at the airport, reading from a statement as the envoys were leaving Beijing.
"We no longer have interest, or expectations either, for this kind of talks," he said. "We are left with no option."
Less than two hours earlier, Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly, who represented the United States in the talks, said all parties had gotten off to "a productive start."
The U.S. Embassy in Beijing said it had no immediate comment on the North Korean delegation's remarks. The Chinese and South Korean governments did not immediately react either.

In Tokyo, Japan's Defense Agency unveiled plans to seek $1.2 billion for U.S.-designed systems to defend against ballistic missiles. The request is part of a major defense initiative spawned by concern over North Korea's long-range missiles.
The agency's annual budget proposal calls for buying two U.S.-developed weapons systems — one sea-based and one land-based — to provide a double shield against missiles with a range of up to 600 miles. Delivery could start as early as 2006.
Japan has been conducting joint research with the United States on missile defense since 1999 — a year after the test-launch of a three-stage North Korean Taepodong missile that flew over Japanese airspace. The incident showed that virtually all of Japan could be targeted by North Korean missiles.

This week's extraordinary three-day, six-country summit was the result of months of delicate political maneuvering. China, the North's last major ally, also played host to diplomats from Japan, South Korea (news - web sites) and Russia.
Tensions have been growing since October, when Pyongyang acknowledged privately to Kelly that it had restarted its nuclear weapons program.
The United States has insisted on "the complete, verifiable and irreversible elimination" of North Korea's nuclear weapons program before it can seriously consider improving relations with the North. But the impoverished Stalinist regime has refused to comply without security and economic aid guarantees.

All the governments represented at the Beijing talks had expressed varying degrees of opposition to the North's nuclear ambitions. China has also said repeatedly that it wants a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula.
The delegates from the six countries said the main goal of the gathering was to establish an opening for future talks and address North Korea's security issues. No date or venue was established, but China Central Television reported that fresh meetings would take place within two months.

"We've had a nice visit to Beijing, a productive start," Kelly told reporters before leaving for the airport. "We've got a very long way to travel."
He added: "But a peaceful solution is something we're going to work on."
Kelly and his delegation met with their North Korean counterparts on Wednesday along the sidelines of the summit, which began on an amicable note as delegates smiled, shook hands and posed for photos. Kelly and Pyongyang's chief delegate, Vice Foreign Minister Kim Yong Il, shook hands with each other before turning to the others.

The informal huddle was the first direct contact between the United States and North Korea since April, when Beijing hosted their meetings on the issue. "The U.S. will not respond to threats or give in to blackmail," she said. "These threats only serve to further isolate North Korea from the international community."

But Kim also showed a willingness to compromise, suggesting that his country would abandon the nuclear weapons program if the United States agreed to its conditions.
"It is not our goal to have nuclear weapons," Pyongyang's state-run news agency, KCNA, quoted Kim as saying.
The delegation spokesman at the airport, however, reverted back to North's original rhetoric.
"This is not just a difference in opinion but a difference in fundamental policies," the North Korean delegation spokesman said. "We have come to conclude that the United States has no intention for a policy switchover and it plots to disarm our country through sinister schemes."
Also Saturday, North Korea's state-run newspaper Minju Joson said its "nuclear deterrent force" is a self-defense measure to cope with what they called U.S. strategy to "stifle" its communist country.
"Our nuclear deterrent force is a self-defense measure to cope with the U.S. strategy to isolate and stifle the DPRK," the newspaper said, according to South Korea's Yonhap news agency.

16 posted on 08/30/2003 3:10:58 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
Don't blink, Mr Bush.

Yes, that is what it will come down to.

I am not a war monger.

But I am absolutely convinced that the take-down of Saddam prevented a wider, and worse war in that region.

North Korea needs to learn a lesson, which will be instructive to Iran as well.

The elimination of WMD on the Korean peninsula, and the elimination of North Korea as a source of proliferation of these weapons to other countries, will prevent a worse catastrophe.

Hold steady, President Bush.

17 posted on 08/30/2003 3:17:39 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe; Finalapproach29er
Our Americans soldiers will no longer be cannon fodder for an ungrateful South Korea.

That's why they are being pulled back and repositioned from the front.

The Bush Administration took the pulse of the homefront and realized that using American soldiers as a "speed bump" in Korea was no longer teneable.

ROK soldiers will die for the liberation of their "brothers" in North Korea, as is appropriate.

18 posted on 08/30/2003 3:23:11 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Steel Wolf
Ping!
19 posted on 08/30/2003 3:26:51 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: happygrl; risk
N. Korea made things easy for us. Now it is clear to everybody that the N. Koream regime won't change. Time to move to the next step. All-out pressures from all sides. Blockade, cutting off oil supply, cutting off all funds into N. Korea, creating mass exodus of refugees, and encouraging a coup. Do these in steps. Let's see how well the N. Korean regime will hold out. In all likelihood, it won't.

That bizzare fat pygmy of Pyongyang should go.

20 posted on 08/30/2003 3:40:24 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson