[ambrose]

Did she object to such things in Bill Clinton?

Uhhhh.... yes she did. She called for his impeachment and removal from office repeatedly on her radio show. So bzzzzzzzzzzz. The only hypocrites around here are the "conservatives" who would excuse "gang-banging" a defenseless woman.

[Mr. Mojo]

"conservatives" who would excuse "gang-banging" a defenseless woman.

Defenseless? Are you saying she was raped?

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

The only hypocrites around here are the "conservatives" who would excuse "gang-banging" a defenseless woman.

I have not read anything (to date) that tells me she wasn't a willing participant in group sex. It's possible that she wasn't, certainly, but I think at this point you're reading that into what was said. I suppose there are other reasons to walk into a room full of men without your clothes on, and I'm certainly one who believes "no" means "no", but...I haven't heard about any "no" yet.

[R. Scott]

…who would excuse "gang-banging" a defenseless woman.

The assumption is that she was a defenseless victim? It’s just as possible that the muscle bound male sex objects were victims of her sexual desire. Have you ever been to Muscle Beach?

[Atlas Sneezed]

The only hypocrites around here are the "conservatives" who would excuse "gang-banging" a defenseless woman.

---

The use by you and other critics of Arnold of the term "gang-bang" without explanation is improper because it carries rape connotations. There is no basis to support the notion that there was not eager consent when you look at Arnold's own words:

"Bodybuilders party a lot, and once, in Gold's--the gym in Venice California where all the top guys train--there was a black girl who came out naked. Everybody jumped on her and took her upstairs, where we all got together."

Interviewer: "A gang bang?

Arnold: "Yes, but not everybody, just the guys who can..."

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/arnoldinter2.html