Skip to comments.
French Propose Their World Order
Insight Magazine ^
| Aug. 29, 2003
| Kenneth R. Timmerman
Posted on 08/29/2003 1:09:27 PM PDT by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
1
posted on
08/29/2003 1:09:27 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
Surrender monkeys at it again.
2
posted on
08/29/2003 1:13:02 PM PDT
by
boomop1
In a direct dig at the Bush administration,
de Villepin insisted that no nation should be allowed to use force, even in the defense of its own interests, without specific approval from the Security Council. "Using force is often tempting," he said, but "can only be justified if collective security or urgent humanitarian needs require it."
Force must be "a last resort," and "only when the international community, through the Security Council, decides."
Globalist puke.
3
posted on
08/29/2003 1:14:30 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi)
To: JeanS
I'm trying to figure out what the U. S. would possibly gain from this. All the nations of the world combined aren't worth the security provided by the U. S. Marine Corps alone, let alone the other service branches.
I like the idea of replacing the U. N. though. Let's just replace it with a nice plaque or something, instead of a new "supersized" U. N. designed by France.
To: JeanS
...de Villepin insisted that no nation should be allowed to use force, even in the defense of its own interests, without specific approval from the Security Council. "Using force is often tempting," he said, but "can only be justified if collective security or urgent humanitarian needs require it." Force must be "a last resort," and "only when the international community, through the Security Council, decides."The sad thing is that are multitudes in the U.S. that will agree with this.
5
posted on
08/29/2003 1:16:04 PM PDT
by
raybbr
To: boomop1
He is trying to make us emulate them.
To: JeanS
de Villepin insisted that no nation should be allowed to use force, even in the defense of its own interestsAt least they aren't hypocrites.....
To: boomop1
Yea but to have the guts to demand we surrender that takes a lot of nerve or few brains.
8
posted on
08/29/2003 1:22:19 PM PDT
by
Gkubly
To: boomop1
I'm sorry, when I first read the Headline I thought it said French Propose their own world ODOR.
To: JeanS
De Villipen gives a new location to living in Lala Land, now it's in France.
Ah, la bellyacher France, which has defied EU for 3 years now in regard to it's deficits. And France that will become Al-France is 50 years or less. Notre Dame, that will have a mosque built on top of it.
France, that marveleous place that is clinging to it's Offal Tower demanding that French be the world's leading language in spite of all the Chinese, Spanish speaking, and not to mention, the hated English speaking peoples.
It does remind one of the band still uselessly playing on on the poop deck while the Titanic sank.
10
posted on
08/29/2003 1:23:12 PM PDT
by
xJones
To: NormsRevenge
The hypocrisy of it all. France uses its force numerous times in Africa.
11
posted on
08/29/2003 1:23:44 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: JeanS
de Villepin insisted that no nation should be allowed to use force, even in the defense of its own interests...Should nations be allowed to bend over and take it up the tailpipe from every dictator that comes along... Does France still advocate this posture???
To: JeanS
In the French New World Order, more people die of heat in a Western 'Democracy'(France: 11,000) than die of war against murderous dictators(Iraq: ~6,000).
Way to go, ingrates.
13
posted on
08/29/2003 1:25:54 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Gainfully employed in World-Class American Exporting Companies since 1984!)
To: JeanS
In a direct dig at the Bush administration, de Villepin insisted that no nation should be allowed to use force, even in the defense of its own interests, without specific approval from the Security Council...We should send half a dozen or so Marines (should be plenty) to invade France and then veto any action by the security council...
To: Snuffington
I like the idea of replacing the U. N. though. Let's just replace it with a nice plaque or something...LOL!
To: JeanS
...Force must be"a last resort," and "only when the international community, through the Security Council, decides." Only one way to read this, I suppose.
The French want the world, and specifically the United States of America, to be ruled a global government--one that is backed up by armed force that exceeds any other on the planet.
Them's fightin' words.
Come get us, Dominique...and bring your friend Kofi...
To: JeanS
Time to make some changes at the UN.
There is no room for anyone but the United States on the Security Council. No one else is important enough to rate a seat.
Because American Counties are about equal to other nations, every American County should have a seat in the General Assembly
So9
To: Corporate Law
Insufficient hospital staff due to mandatory max hours limits for all government workers including medical staff in a socialized system.
Leaving the elderly relatives home to die as families go on a month-long vacation and the whole country except the tourist resorts and the funeral homes shut down.
Facing every problem by making the crucial decision of who or what to surrender to.
Adoration of, and abject submission to, the State. No appreciation of the importance of individual freedom as against the interests of the State as determined by the whims of the mob or the Robespierre or Napoleon of the moment.
Yes. France is the model to follow.
18
posted on
08/29/2003 1:31:42 PM PDT
by
Montfort
To: Brad Cloven
You do have a point. In France's world, everyone could ship all their old relatives to Paris and then go on vacation. The French know how to handle these things.
19
posted on
08/29/2003 1:32:11 PM PDT
by
xJones
To: JeanS
So, if the French are proposing this, would this plan be known as "Le Pew World Order"?
20
posted on
08/29/2003 1:33:39 PM PDT
by
Choose Ye This Day
(Moving to Turkmenistan, where all the jobs are.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson