Posted on 08/29/2003 12:09:39 PM PDT by Brian S
The bomb attack on the holy city of Najaf in Iraq dealt a new blow to US hopes of bringing stability to the country as well as killing a key moderating influence on the Iraqi Shiite community, US experts said.
Ayatollah Mohammad Baqer al-Hakim, a leading Shiiite Muslim cleric, was among at least 82 people killed in the car bomb set off outside the Tomb of Ali, one of the Islamic world's most important shrines.
Coming barely 10 days after the truck bomb that killed 23 people at the UN offices in Baghdad, including the UN special envoy Sergio Vieira de Mello, US and British of stabilising Iraq now look even more forelorn.
"Things are going rotten, we are seeing a degradation for which there appears to be no remedy," said Simon Serfaty, a specialist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
"American military power seems to unable to keep up with events in a country where everything is out of control."
US forces have been kept away from the shrine to Imam Ali in Najaf in recent months because of its sensitive nature.
There have been virtually daily attacks on US forces since President George W. Bush declared the end of major combat in Iraq on May 1.
More troops have been killed since the end of the war than during the invasion and the US administration is fighting off mounting calls in Congress to reinforce the 140,000 US forces in Iraq.
The killing of the cleric in the attack also wiped out a key stabilising influence in the country, which is predominantly Shiite and a vital link with Iran, where al-Hakim had lived in exile for 23 years until the fall of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.
Mary-Jane Deeb, a Middle East specialist at the American University in Washington, said that Hakim "wanted to prevent a confrontation between Shiites and Americans, between Iranians and Americans, between Shiites and Sunnites."
Hakim "was a moderate in the sense that he wanted to keep things calm and take his time, even if his aim was to establish an Islamic republic," said Deeb.
Hakim, head of the Iran-backed Supreme Assembly of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, was represented by one of his brothers on the US-named interim governing council.
Despite Hakim's links with Iran, the United States had considered his group a negotiating partner long before the fall of Saddam, in a sign to Shiites in Iraq and its Iranian sponsor.
Though no claim of responsibility was made, the attack came only three days after the Al-Arabiya satellite television channel broadcast a video of masked men threatening members of the interim governing council and those who support it.
The United States responded to the broadcast with fury.
Highlighting US fears that the message would be heard in Iraq, a State Department spokesman said it was "irresponsible in the extreme" to give a stage to the threats and plans of "these masked terrorists".
US forces have been kept away from the shrine to Imam Ali in Najaf in recent months because of its sensitive nature.
Hmm - seems to me that the problem is not the inability of the American military to exert control, but the unwillingness of certain parties to accept U.S. protection.
I stopped reading right here. The author loses credibility as soon as he resorts to hyperbole such as "everything is out of control." An obvious hit piece. And not even a subtle one at that.
LOL! So that makes it America's fault that terrorists are resisting such a metamorphosis? Please. And to think we've had the nerve not to have a Utopian democracy in place in 4-5 months!
You are saying that things in Iraq are, generally, in control?
Little early to declare defeat (but not for the French of course).
I agree with that statement, but the article is definitely pinning the blame where it doesn't belong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.