To: Eastbound
how you would resolve a perceived grievance by 81 per cent of the people? I already told you how I would resolve it. According to the rule of law, which means obeying a lawful order from a legally constituted court, even if I thought it was wrong.
If you don't agree, then you can try peaceful non-violent protest, or you can try violence, but in the end it's gonna come out the same way. The rule of law is going to prevail.
28 posted on
08/30/2003 3:33:36 PM PDT by
CobaltBlue
(Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
To: CobaltBlue
" I already told you how I would resolve it. According to the rule of law, which means obeying a lawful order from a legally constituted court, even if I thought it was wrong.." As I mentioned earlier, that's a rightous stance too. Do you think this particluar 'law' is wrong?
To: CobaltBlue
If you don't agree, then you can try peaceful non-violent protest, or you can try violence, but in the end it's gonna come out the same way. The rule of law is going to prevail. I do not confuse the rule of law with the ruling of judges, as you seem to.
34 posted on
08/30/2003 4:32:19 PM PDT by
gogeo
(Life is hard. It's really hard if you're stupid.)
To: CobaltBlue
If you don't agree, then you can try peaceful non-violent protest, or you can try violence, but in the end it's gonna come out the same way. The rule of law is going to prevail. Also, it appears there's a little bit of confusion about the meaning of, "The consent of the governed."
35 posted on
08/30/2003 4:34:14 PM PDT by
gogeo
(Life is hard. It's really hard if you're stupid.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson