Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockitz
Ya know, it is impossible to reason with you so I won't. I guess having been an accountant for 25 years, it is just impossible for me to understand 'revenue neutral'. There is no such thing as revenue neutral, EXCEPT in your own mind. If you understood economics you would understand how ridiculous your term 'revenue neutral' is.

I wish you well... good bye.

158 posted on 08/29/2003 10:36:52 PM PDT by spirit_free (How many Congressional Democrats belong to the Socialist Party of America ..... lots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: spirit_free
Actually, as has been brought up by a couple others on this thread, besides illegals, the VAT would catch all who get cash compensation including- those involved in illegal activities like drug dealing, prostitution, etc. You're right it's not revenue neutral, it's a plus from a collections standpoint and an actual reduction for traditional taxpayers.

BTW, I have graduate courses in economics- probably more than you, my friend.
167 posted on 08/30/2003 3:09:36 PM PDT by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson