When the gun-grabbers start attacking the candidate who is generaly considered the most liberal, you know they're sliding into irrelevance. Ain't it sweet?
1 posted on
08/29/2003 6:14:00 AM PDT by
jmc813
To: Joe Brower; Shooter 2.5
Y'all might be interested
2 posted on
08/29/2003 6:16:16 AM PDT by
jmc813
(Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
To: jmc813
The counter-counter campaign begins . . . . .
3 posted on
08/29/2003 6:16:56 AM PDT by
TexasNative2000
(The joy of the Lord is my strength.)
To: jmc813
It was bought from an irresponsible dealer in West Virginia. How was the dealer irresponsible? Either criminal charges should be filed against the dealer for violating the law, or this dealer should sue the Brady campaign for libel.
4 posted on
08/29/2003 6:19:24 AM PDT by
coloradan
To: jmc813
That's the liberal arguement for federal control. Guns from NC going into NY force federal law to override NC law. My State Constitution is clearly worded, I'll take an original intent interpetation of it anyday.
5 posted on
08/29/2003 6:21:52 AM PDT by
steve50
(Democracy; The art and science of running the circus from the monkeyhouse. Mencken)
To: *bang_list
7 posted on
08/29/2003 6:26:38 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." -- Thomas Paine)
To: jmc813
This shows the utter ignorance and stupidity of the Bradyites.
Gun laws should be at the State Level you morons! When the criminal crosses state lines and commits a crime with the gun it the becomes an interstate commerce issue and the CRIME can be tried in Federal Court you friggin DOOFUSes.
Much like the Domestic Abuse ruling issued by the SCOTUS in 2000. If the abuse happens in one state, it is a state matter and can ONLY be tried in state court. IF the abuser crosses stata LINES the crime becomes Federal.
This is not friggin rocket science here you dolts.
The States control GUN LAWS for their state. if a criminal crosses state lines and commits a crime then the CRIME becomes a federal CRIME - the damn gun law has nothing to do with it.
8 posted on
08/29/2003 6:32:41 AM PDT by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: jmc813
That's alright. They'll have Hillary who'll give them Howard Dean minus any remote protection of constitutional liberties.
Hillary is a human statue of liberty. Who could be against that?
To: jmc813
I don't care if Dean carried a two gun rig. He's still a dork.
To: jmc813
Huh....Blind Squirrel, meet Nut.
To: jmc813
Perhaps Dean will have success in convincing criminals to promise not to carry their guns across state lines, and convincing gun traffickers not to buy or sell them across state lines. Governor, guns cross state borders. Of course, they cross national borders, too, so we can't settle for national gun laws. We need international law, governed by the UN, to ensure gun safety.
And then of course, there is the interplanetary issue. Do you want your children acquiring unsafe death rays due to the space alien loophole?
13 posted on
08/29/2003 7:18:25 AM PDT by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
To: jmc813
First good thing I've read about Dean.
But then, his home state does have unlicensed (i.e., free) concealed carry.
15 posted on
08/29/2003 11:09:54 AM PDT by
Redbob
To: jmc813
How much do you want to bet this will induce Dean to cozy up to the gun grabbers?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson