To: Princeliberty
Sorry, you've been greatly misinformed. Arnold is a supply-sider, endorsed by Milton Friedman the great Reagan man himself. He has been advocating less taxes and government cuts. Arnold has also been campaigning and fundraising faithfully for Republicans for two decades.
Bloomberg, on the other hand, was a Democrat all his life until he decided to switch and run as a Republican specifically for the election.
No comparison.
(and plenty of Republicans disagreed with the impeachment because they knew the liberal press would twist it to make Republicans look petty and vengeful... which is exactly what happened)
216 posted on
08/30/2003 1:16:55 AM PDT by
Tamzee
(Finish your beer. There are sober people in India.)
To: Tamsey
(and plenty of Republicans disagreed with the impeachment because they knew the liberal press would twist it to make Republicans look petty and vengeful... which is exactly what happened)
Which is an admission of defeat without a battle. The liberal press is going to smear Republicans whether they do anything meaningful or not...even if they have to make shit up.
The PROPER response is to go farther right, not to become some sort of French surrender-monkey and move left.
223 posted on
08/30/2003 6:38:31 AM PDT by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: Tamsey
Arnold has a few times campaigned for Republicans
only a few and als campaigned for Ted Kennedy in 1994
when it looked he was in trouble.
Friedman is like the one guy with decent views
around Arnold in swamp of socialist and big government
advisers.
I am not sure Friedman really with it these days.
I don't think Arnold's even called himself a supply sider
even.
To: Tamsey
Most those Republicans I doubt said anything
about being "ashamed" of the Republicans for impeaching
Clinton.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson