[AndrewC]

My statement:-->No. You are the one asserting that the presence of a stone in a state building somehow is a law establishing a religion.

Wrong. I never said such a thing in any of my posts.

Isn't the following your statement?

The law Judge Moore defied was one dictating that NO ONE has the right to use the Govt to impose their religion on others.

[Jorge]

AndrewC;No. You are the one asserting that the presence of a stone in a state building somehow is a law establishing a religion.

Jorge"Wrong. I never said such a thing in any of my posts."

AndrewC;Isn't the following your statement?
"The law Judge Moore defied was one dictating that NO ONE has the right to use the Govt to impose their religion on others."

Of course it's my statement.

But nowhere do I state that *defying a law* is the same as creating a new "law establishing a religion."

My statement says that Judge Moore was abusing his position in Govt to impose his religion on others. You don't need to create a law to do this.