Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimt
He explicitly said no other religious type monuments could be placed there, as his was "from God" and the others weren't.

And that is his opinion. But it does not establish a state religion because it is there. If you put a Montana state flag in an Indiana courtroom, it doesn't change the state. The monument did not establish a religion. It's merely a common philosophy. Some may revere it. Some may not. It's only a problem if people are forced to worship it.

99 posted on 08/28/2003 2:06:53 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
The problem is his using his government position and facilities to make religious statements;

1) the laws of God as stated in the Ten Commandments are superior to any other law;

2) what (the words) he has chiseled on his monument comes from God;

3) he derives his secular judicial powers from God;

4) no other religious statements may be made there, only his.

108 posted on 08/28/2003 2:18:56 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson